Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2697 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Independence Referendum (10th Anniversary)

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

Thank you, Presiding Officer.

Meeting of the Parliament

Creating a Modern, Diverse and Dynamic Scotland

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

The member claims that it is decisions at Westminster that have resulted in the cost of living crisis. Does she not agree that maybe Ukraine or the pandemic had something to do with it?

Meeting of the Parliament

Creating a Modern, Diverse and Dynamic Scotland

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

Will the member take an intervention?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with Channel 4 in relation to increasing its made outside England quota from 9 per cent to 16 per cent in line with population breakdown, as called for by Pact, the independent television representative body. (S6O-03717)

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

I am sure that the cabinet secretary shares my anger that Ofcom, instead of proceeding with a 16 per cent quota, chose to proceed with a 12 per cent quota, and even that will not apply until 2030. That will mean that 25 per cent fewer programmes will be made in Scotland and 25 per cent fewer people will be involved than would have been the case if the quota had been accepted.

Scottish freelancers in the independent TV industry are really hurting, and many are being forced out of the industry. What more can the Government do, in conjunction with Pact and Screen Scotland, to protect the industry as it goes through a difficult time?

Meeting of the Parliament

Independence Referendum (10th Anniversary)

Meeting date: 18 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

While sitting in the chamber earlier today and listening to the nationalists going over the same old arguments about independence, I decided to look at the agreement between both our Governments that set up the 2014 referendum. It said:

“The governments are agreed that the referendum should ... have a clear legal base”,

that it

“should be legislated for by the Scottish Parliament”

and that it should be

“conducted so as to command the confidence of parliaments, governments and people”

and

“deliver a fair test and a decisive expression of the views of people in Scotland and a result that everyone will respect.”

That is the problem—the nationalists have never respected the result of the referendum and have embarked on a journey of grievance politics to make their case for another one.

We should not really be surprised. After all, all the SNP exists for is to try to rip our country apart. It exists not to improve the lives of Scots, to run our country well or to bring economic growth, but to sow division and use every tool in its nationalist toolbox to cause that division, even by using the doomed deposit return scheme as a weapon.

Its Scottish Green chums are no better. It must be the only Green party in the world to care more about division and gender ideology than about climate issues. [Interruption.] I am not going to take an intervention at the moment.

I do like the part of the motion that talks about understanding

“that support for Scottish independence has consistently polled at 45% to 50% of Scotland’s population in the decade since”.

That tells me that support to remain part of the United Kingdom has consistently polled at 50 per cent to 55 per cent, which shows that, despite a pandemic, a war in Ukraine, three new First Ministers, six Prime Ministers, Brexit, four general elections—one of which was meant to be a de facto referendum—Jamie Hepburn as independence minister and the constant stream of independence papers that even Humza Yousaf admitted nobody reads, the desire for independence has not increased one little bit.

It is time for this Parliament to focus on what it was created to do—to improve the lives of Scots with the power that it has and to put aside the constitutional grievance that is holding Scotland back.

George Adam rose—

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

Okay. Does anybody else have a view on the timetabling?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

Do you feel that there will be enough opportunities for you to play into the process of setting the target, given that it will be in regulations and not in the bill?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

Does anybody else want to respond to that question? It appears not.

In the position paper, the Scottish Government says that it does not intend to align with the UK carbon budget periods. Do you have a view on that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 September 2024

Douglas Lumsden

I will pick up something that Bob Doris mentioned. I was going to ask about surpluses and deficits, but I think that we have mostly covered that under banking and borrowing. Should surpluses and deficits be allowed to be carried forward to the next budget? Mike Robinson, you made it clear in your submission that you do not agree with that, but I am interested to hear what others have to say.