The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2697 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you, Presiding Officer.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
The member claims that it is decisions at Westminster that have resulted in the cost of living crisis. Does she not agree that maybe Ukraine or the pandemic had something to do with it?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Will the member take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with Channel 4 in relation to increasing its made outside England quota from 9 per cent to 16 per cent in line with population breakdown, as called for by Pact, the independent television representative body. (S6O-03717)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I am sure that the cabinet secretary shares my anger that Ofcom, instead of proceeding with a 16 per cent quota, chose to proceed with a 12 per cent quota, and even that will not apply until 2030. That will mean that 25 per cent fewer programmes will be made in Scotland and 25 per cent fewer people will be involved than would have been the case if the quota had been accepted.
Scottish freelancers in the independent TV industry are really hurting, and many are being forced out of the industry. What more can the Government do, in conjunction with Pact and Screen Scotland, to protect the industry as it goes through a difficult time?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
While sitting in the chamber earlier today and listening to the nationalists going over the same old arguments about independence, I decided to look at the agreement between both our Governments that set up the 2014 referendum. It said:
“The governments are agreed that the referendum should ... have a clear legal base”,
that it
“should be legislated for by the Scottish Parliament”
and that it should be
“conducted so as to command the confidence of parliaments, governments and people”
and
“deliver a fair test and a decisive expression of the views of people in Scotland and a result that everyone will respect.”
That is the problem—the nationalists have never respected the result of the referendum and have embarked on a journey of grievance politics to make their case for another one.
We should not really be surprised. After all, all the SNP exists for is to try to rip our country apart. It exists not to improve the lives of Scots, to run our country well or to bring economic growth, but to sow division and use every tool in its nationalist toolbox to cause that division, even by using the doomed deposit return scheme as a weapon.
Its Scottish Green chums are no better. It must be the only Green party in the world to care more about division and gender ideology than about climate issues. [Interruption.] I am not going to take an intervention at the moment.
I do like the part of the motion that talks about understanding
“that support for Scottish independence has consistently polled at 45% to 50% of Scotland’s population in the decade since”.
That tells me that support to remain part of the United Kingdom has consistently polled at 50 per cent to 55 per cent, which shows that, despite a pandemic, a war in Ukraine, three new First Ministers, six Prime Ministers, Brexit, four general elections—one of which was meant to be a de facto referendum—Jamie Hepburn as independence minister and the constant stream of independence papers that even Humza Yousaf admitted nobody reads, the desire for independence has not increased one little bit.
It is time for this Parliament to focus on what it was created to do—to improve the lives of Scots with the power that it has and to put aside the constitutional grievance that is holding Scotland back.
George Adam rose—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Okay. Does anybody else have a view on the timetabling?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Do you feel that there will be enough opportunities for you to play into the process of setting the target, given that it will be in regulations and not in the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
Does anybody else want to respond to that question? It appears not.
In the position paper, the Scottish Government says that it does not intend to align with the UK carbon budget periods. Do you have a view on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Douglas Lumsden
I will pick up something that Bob Doris mentioned. I was going to ask about surpluses and deficits, but I think that we have mostly covered that under banking and borrowing. Should surpluses and deficits be allowed to be carried forward to the next budget? Mike Robinson, you made it clear in your submission that you do not agree with that, but I am interested to hear what others have to say.