The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1969 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I guess that it is about checking whether the instructions flowing from the main contractor down to subcontractors were clear.
I turn to my next question. The threshold for liability for senior responsible officials of an organisation is one of consent or connivance. The committee has heard views that consent, connivance or neglect would be preferable. Do you have views on that? Maybe we can go to Clare Moran first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Could we do that by beefing up our existing laws as opposed to introducing a new law?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes—at least I did, but I have lost my place because I was listening intently.
The committee has been considering whether the bill will have a deterrent effect on individual and corporate behaviours and avoid instances of severe environmental damage. Are you aware of any evidence on how businesses or organisations have changed what they are doing because ecocide laws have been introduced? I will go to Ricardo first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Rachel Killean, do you have any more information about how the ecocide law is working in France? How many successful prosecutions have there been? Have organisations made any changes because of the threat of breaching ecocide laws?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
You mentioned one investigation taking place in France. Have there been any prosecutions so far? When they introduced the law, was it replacing an existing law or was it an addition to what they already had?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Do we need the Acorn project in place before we can produce SAF?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
That links to my next question. The bill does not explicitly set out that undertaking licensed or consented activities cannot constitute ecocide or provide a defence along those lines. That has raised concerns among different sectors, including farming, fishing and renewables. Is the approach in the bill appropriate? What implications might it have for SEPA and NatureScot, as bodies that are actively involved in consenting and permitting?
Perhaps we can hear from Dr Mitchell, as he raised that issue.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
In my questions, I will continue to ask about project willow, which the deputy convener raised with you. There are two SAF projects in project willow. One is about first-generation SAF—the HEFA one—and the other is about third-generation SAF. Should we still be pursuing the first-generation project, especially when we look at the mandates that are coming forward? That is almost like a bridge to other fuels in the future. Is it still feasible to have that project within project willow?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
We spoke about responsibilities flowing down. You are responsible for licensing and consenting, so are you in danger of committing ecocide if you permit too many things? Could the responsibility then go back up to SEPA or even to the Scottish Government?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I put the same question on finances to Dr Mitchell. Does the figure cover what you might have to do?