The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1757 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Amendment 174 includes the words
“where the person is resident for tax purposes”.
Will the member expand a little on what is intended? For example, if someone lived in a different country, would that rule them out of purchasing land, even if they were going to invest substantial amounts of money in Scotland, or would there be some other mechanism to decide whether that would rule a person in or out of a land purchase?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I will speak to amendment 364 first. A big issue across Scotland is that communities feel ignored and overruled when it comes to much of the electricity infrastructure that we are seeing pop up across the countryside. It is only right that we try to address that issue in the bill so that we allow communities to have a real say.
If, for example, a community wants a battery storage facility, and that would offer proper community benefits, such as jobs, and if the community embraces it or even wants part ownership of it, that should be welcomed and encouraged.
However, we need to address the situation of communities that are strongly against things that are happening in their areas. I think that that is the aim of the bill, so we should be listening to those communities, and that is what my amendment 364 aims to achieve. If there is a strong community objection to electricity infrastructure in an area, we should be listening to and taking on board those views.
It boils down to the issue that I have raised in some of the questions that I have been asking. Public interest and community interest are not always the same thing—there are often conflicts between them. Even in some of the public interest descriptions that have been laid before us today, conflicts can be seen. One that I can see is between food security and a just transition, as a lot of the time, good farmland is being turned over to use for solar panels and battery storage. That example highlights that there are often conflicts within the public interest definition that has been laid before us.
I will also talk to amendment 174, in the name of Mercedes Villalba.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Okay.
Cabinet secretary, how do the regulations ensure that there is a good distribution of return points, especially in rural areas and on the islands?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
So, will people get money back or, as you just mentioned, a voucher?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
We do not know that yet.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Do you think that that is long enough?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
So there will be no special status for it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am just trying to ask the question. If somebody goes to some hospitality place—a cafe, for example—and buys a can of Coke, they will have to take it with them if they want to get their money back. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Douglas Lumsden
You will have to take all the empties.