Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 30 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1757 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Amendment 174 includes the words

“where the person is resident for tax purposes”.

Will the member expand a little on what is intended? For example, if someone lived in a different country, would that rule them out of purchasing land, even if they were going to invest substantial amounts of money in Scotland, or would there be some other mechanism to decide whether that would rule a person in or out of a land purchase?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I will speak to amendment 364 first. A big issue across Scotland is that communities feel ignored and overruled when it comes to much of the electricity infrastructure that we are seeing pop up across the countryside. It is only right that we try to address that issue in the bill so that we allow communities to have a real say.

If, for example, a community wants a battery storage facility, and that would offer proper community benefits, such as jobs, and if the community embraces it or even wants part ownership of it, that should be welcomed and encouraged.

However, we need to address the situation of communities that are strongly against things that are happening in their areas. I think that that is the aim of the bill, so we should be listening to those communities, and that is what my amendment 364 aims to achieve. If there is a strong community objection to electricity infrastructure in an area, we should be listening to and taking on board those views.

It boils down to the issue that I have raised in some of the questions that I have been asking. Public interest and community interest are not always the same thing—there are often conflicts between them. Even in some of the public interest descriptions that have been laid before us today, conflicts can be seen. One that I can see is between food security and a just transition, as a lot of the time, good farmland is being turned over to use for solar panels and battery storage. That example highlights that there are often conflicts within the public interest definition that has been laid before us.

I will also talk to amendment 174, in the name of Mercedes Villalba.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Okay.

Cabinet secretary, how do the regulations ensure that there is a good distribution of return points, especially in rural areas and on the islands?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

So, will people get money back or, as you just mentioned, a voucher?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

We do not know that yet.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Do you think that that is long enough?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

So there will be no special status for it.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I am just trying to ask the question. If somebody goes to some hospitality place—a cafe, for example—and buys a can of Coke, they will have to take it with them if they want to get their money back. Is that correct?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Douglas Lumsden

You will have to take all the empties.