The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2955 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
It is not about political theatre; it is about—
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I can tell from my inbox that it is well above the average. If the Scottish Government committed to delivering a community audiology service, high street audiologists would be able to deliver the service in as little as 18 weeks and clear more than 70,000 people from audiology waiting lists. What is preventing the minister from scoring an easy win and delivering on her party’s manifesto commitment to put community audiology services on par with the successful community eye care model?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Does the SNP no longer have any idea what should be in the plan, or does it fear the backlash when people realise what is in it? I agree with Mr Carson—I think that it is both.
The SNP does not want to be honest with offshore workers on its position on oil and gas. It does not want to be honest with our rural communities about the impact that the scale of expensive renewables will have on our countryside, whether that is monster pylons, battery storage or substations. It does not want to be honest with our fishermen about the impact that offshore wind will have on fishing grounds, nor does it want to be honest with households about the true cost of renewables and their impact on bills. Instead of the cabinet secretary jetting off around the world, she should meet communities and hear people’s concerns.
Scotland is blessed with one of the most highly regulated, low-carbon oil and gas basins in the world. The North Sea is not the problem; it is part of the solution. The public agree: 84 per cent of Scots support continuing domestic oil and gas production during the transition. Therefore, the Parliament must send a clear message today: that it does not support the SNP’s presumption against new oil and gas, it does not support Labour’s punitive energy profits levy and it stands with Scotland’s workers, Scotland’s energy security and Scotland’s economy.
This country needs a transition that is built on realism, not ideology. The SNP refuses to give clear support to the industry and Labour says that our future is not in oil and gas. However, we say plainly that Scotland needs its domestic oil and gas industry, it needs energy security and it needs a fair and affordable path to net zero. That begins with backing our own workers, our own resources and our own future. I urge colleagues across the chamber to back my motion.
I move,
That the Parliament regrets the Scottish Government’s ideological drive to end North Sea oil and gas exploration and production; notes the negative impact on oil and gas jobs, energy security, the economy and the environment of the Scottish Government’s failure to pursue an informed, data-led, evidence-based North Sea policy; demands the immediate and unequivocal reversal of the Scottish Government’s presumption against new oil and gas exploration and production, and calls on the UK Government to immediately abolish the Energy Profits Levy.
15:01Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Will the member take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Will the member take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am sticking with the topic of the costs and benefits. As was mentioned, the costs and benefits at a sectoral level are set out in the draft plan. What are your views on how those have been quantified and presented? Is there enough detail in the plan to enable us to analyse what the costs are?
I put that question to Clare Wharmby first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Graeme Roy, was the Scottish Fiscal Commission involved in putting figures into the plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Do you think that there will be a link between the budget that we will see in the next couple of months and this document? Perhaps because it is still in draft form, there is no link between the two at the moment.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
This might be a question for the Government, but does it have that detail? It must have some idea of costs; we are given headline figures, so the working must be there. I guess that it is about trying to get that working from the Scottish Government.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Richard Dixon, do you think that there is enough detail on the financials in the climate change plan as it stands?