Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 12 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2698 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Rural Crime and Equipment Theft

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Earlier, we heard from Tim Eagle about fly-tipping. Is fly-tipping one of the priorities that was listed, and what actions is the Scottish Government taking to reduce fly-tipping in rural areas?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

We have heard mixed views from stakeholders on whether registration should be required in advance of people exercising a pre-emptive right to buy. Some have argued that there are barriers to registering and others have argued that it is important that the landlord knows which areas of the farm are subject to a pre-emptive right to buy and the boundaries of those areas. Does the Scottish Government recognise that both concerns are valid? How will it balance those two considerations?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

I want to move on to the community right to buy, cabinet secretary, and will start with a general question. You have mentioned that the existing community right to buy powers are presently under review. Why is the bill being brought forward at the same time as that significant review, and what will happen if the review recommends significant changes to the process that is in the bill?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Do you think that Government amendments will be lodged?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

The committee has also heard evidence suggesting that the pre-notification and registration provisions in the bill are unnecessarily complex and difficult to navigate. Why was that approach taken? Could there be changes to them?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

So the definition will come from that piece of work.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Will the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill cross-reference that? Is there a need for that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

Okay. I am a lot clearer on that. Thank you for that explanation.

On the bill, we have heard evidence that there is no minimum threshold for prohibiting and notifying land transfers, which means that a minor land or property sale of part of a large landholding would trigger the relevant section. Why has the Government gone down that route? Given the evidence, are you planning to make changes to accommodate some of the concerns that we have heard about?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

So that will come from guidance further down the line.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Douglas Lumsden

When processes are vague, it can lay them open to legal challenge further down the line. It seems that views vary on how strictly boundaries should be specified. Some stakeholders have told us that they need to be properly defined, but the Scottish Land Commission has argued that boundary definitions are not necessary at the point of registration and could occur later. What is the Scottish Government’s view?