The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3259 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Okay, Presiding Officer.
We have the former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon in favour of a presumption against oil and gas; wannabe First Minister Stephen Flynn, pretending to be a friend of the industry; and John Swinney, with splinters in his backside from trying to sit on the fence, not telling us whether he supports or opposes Rosebank—but we all know that he is no friend of the industry.
Labour’s position is hardly clearer. Its front bench has said that
“our future does not lie in more oil and gas”,—[Official Report, House of Commons, 4 February 2025; Vol 761, c 658.]
while pressing ahead with a headline 78 per cent tax rate and scrapping investment allowances that underpin jobs and investment. That uncertainty drives away capital investment and places Scottish jobs at risk. In 2021, Anas Sarwar tweeted that it was time that Nicola Sturgeon opposed the ecological threat of the proposed Cambo oilfield, and yet, this week, he seems to have had a change of heart and pretends to be a supporter. He is so treacherous that he could be mistaken for Alan Carr, and that all matters because, at the end of the day, we are talking about people and their livelihoods.
Independent analysis warns that ill-judged policies could put up to 100,000 jobs at risk across the UK and strip out tens of billions of pounds of investment. The Scottish Affairs Committee has warned against accelerating decline, while clean energy jobs are not yet coming on stream at the pace that is required. We witnessed that this week at Aberdeen harbour, where redundancies were announced on the back of the oil and gas downturn.
We are going to be using hydrocarbons for years to come, so let us do that in a responsible way that uses home-grown production that supports British jobs and provides revenue for our vital public services. Let us get behind our oil and gas workers.
I move amendment S6M-19637.3, to leave out “opposes” and insert “supports”.
15:14Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
What does that have to do with the motion?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
To ask the Scottish Government whether the culture secretary has met with STV following recent reports of its plan to close its north of Scotland news programme. (S6O-05129)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Sorry. Does the minister think that Gillian Martin’s constituents will be happy that she is one of the top 100 people in climate change when they see our constituencies being railroaded with pylons, substations and everything else?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
That is unbelievable.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Will the member give way?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am sorry, but I do not have time.
That will mean pay packets for families, orders for the supply chain and tax revenue for public services. My constituents in the north-east understand that reality because they live it every single day. The industry is vital for Scotland, and yet the SNP ties itself in knots. We have jet set Gillian Martin, who spends her time cosying up to wind developers and selling off Scotland’s countryside, but fails to stand up—
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
What is needed for stable investment is clear guidance, but we are not getting that from the UK Government or from the Scottish Government. There is no energy strategy at all, and, let us be honest, Scotland will still need oil and gas for years to come. The question is whether we meet part of that need from our own regulated basin and skilled workforce or whether we import more from abroad at a higher cost and with higher emissions. However, the champagne socialists are too stupid to understand that.
If people care about the climate, they should care about where we source what we still use.
Rosebank is a strategic project. It will bring £8.5 billion in direct investment and support around 2,000 jobs and it could add up to £25 billion to the wider economy, with up to 300 million barrels recoverable—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes, I would imagine that that would be a bit of a legal minefield—almost a lawyers’ holy grail.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Sorry, Clare, are you saying that adding negligence would not add anything at all?