The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1848 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you, convener. It is good to be back.
I fully support the petitioner’s call for the Scottish Government to publish its energy strategy and I hope that the committee has more luck than me in that regard. I checked in the Official Report and found that, in the past 18 months, I have asked the Government about this issue 16 times and have received no answer—perhaps that is a reflection on me.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
No, just the 16 times, convener.
I read the Government’s response to the committee with interest. It claims that it is taking time to analyse and reflect on developments, but it has been two and a half years since it published its draft policy. How long does it need? We have had two and a half years of uncertainty, of a presumption against oil and gas and of no just transition plan, while thousands of jobs are being lost in the North Sea.
In all that time, in the absence of a strategy, we have had a vacuum. Perhaps that was the Government’s aim, because that vacuum is being filled by a presumption in favour of unlimited and expensive onshore and offshore wind and all the infrastructure that comes with it. We must also acknowledge that generation and demand happen in different regions, so the future will be mega pylons and substations, which will damage much of our beautiful rural areas.
As we heard in relation to the previous petition about hydrogen, there is no plan regarding how much hydrogen will be produced. Further, battery storage is out of control. The sector is often referred to as the wild west, as it seems to be a money-making scheme in which companies buy up cheap electricity in periods when our intermittent supply builds up a surplus and sell it back when prices are high.
We know that the Scottish Government is blocking new nuclear power stations, but we do not know what its stance is on new gas-powered stations, for example. We must presume that, in the future, when the wind does not blow, base load will be met by imports. We should be concerned about grid stability as the inertia from traditional power stations is withdrawn—Fergus Ewing often brings that up in the chamber. All of that matters because we need to plan properly if we are to avoid blackouts such as we have seen in Spain.
I am coming to the conclusion that the reason why the Government is not coming forward with an energy strategy is because that would mean that it would have to be honest with people about its vision, which, I presume, is to have rural communities covered in battery storage, onshore wind farms, substations and mega pylons.
Our rural communities are mobilising against that. We heard earlier about the meeting in Inverness, where the Highlands community councils came together. We have a similar meeting coming up soon in Aberdeenshire, and the same thing is happening in Perthshire and the Borders, where people have the exact same fears. People feel that they are being ignored, and they just want some clarity and honesty from the Government.
For the sake of our rural communities, and for the sake of our oil and gas workers, I urge the committee to again ask the Scottish Government to set out some timescales so that we can have some clarity.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I have another question on enforcement. We heard earlier that organisations such as SEPA are really up against it when it comes to resource. How will giving SEPA even more powers through the bill help when it is already struggling in that respect?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Does anybody else have a view on how that would work cross border?
If not, I will hand back to the convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes, convener. I will be quick.
On enforcement, is section 9 of the bill, which seeks to extend enforcement powers in relation to ecocide, sufficient to ensure that the relevant authorities have the power to investigate a potential offence?
I will come to Jamie Whittle first of all. Do you have a view on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I will move on to enforcement, which we have touched on already. Do you have any views or concerns about how the bill might be enforced, or about the resources that would be required to enforce the bill effectively? Do you have a view, Simon?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Is it clear who would enforce the bill in different areas?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Elspeth, do you have a view on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Does anybody else have a view on that? I might be really quick here, convener.