The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2756 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Douglas Lumsden
To ask the Scottish Government how much of the £20 million housing infrastructure fund that was launched in 2016, as part of the 10-year Aberdeen city region deal, has been spent. (S6O-05025)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Douglas Lumsden
First, I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which shows that I was a councillor at Aberdeen City Council at the start of this parliamentary session.
While I was council leader at Aberdeen, we found it impossible to access that cash, which is why zero of it has been spent. Calls by my colleague Liam Kerr to use that £20 million pot to compensate reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete home owners in Torry, which I would have thought was a good solution, have fallen on deaf ears in this Scottish National Party Government. Will the cabinet secretary reach out to both Aberdeen City Council and Aberdeenshire Council to find ways for that money to be spent on housing before it is lost to the north-east?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Okay. My next question takes me back to a subject that Mark Ruskell raised. I think that you said that no work has been done on surplus feedstock or where all the feedstock is going to come from. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
What are other countries doing when it comes to SAF production? We mentioned Europe, but what about China and the US? From our papers, I can see that we import a huge amount of used cooking oil from China. Does China not require that for its own SAF production? What are other countries doing in that area?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you. I have one other question. Earlier, we took evidence about Grangemouth and looked at e-fertilisers. One problem that was identified was that green hydrogen production is too expensive at present. In France, where they have a lot of nuclear, they produce hydrogen at a much lower cost than we do. When we are looking to produce e-fuels in future, will it be a problem for us that our costs will be too high because our hydrogen production is currently too expensive?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Does anybody else want to comment on the costs?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
So, with 100 per cent SAF, we are looking at an increase of 3 to 12 percentage points.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Will the bill produce the policies that we need to stimulate both demand for and supply of SAF?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
As you said, it is expensive in the short term. Is the bill a way of getting that money to invest to bridge that gap?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes. I want to pick up on the point that the cost of a flight from London to Dubai could increase by 3 to 12 percentage points. That seems a huge range. Is there a reason why it is so big? Also, would the SAF percentage be 1 per cent or 3 per cent? What mixture of SAF and normal jet fuel would give rise to a cost increase of 3 to 12 percentage points?