The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2953 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
The committee has heard concerns that defining the responsibility of individuals in relation to the corresponding type of organisation could leave scope for non-senior staff—middle managers, for example—to be prosecuted. Do you think that that is right?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
However, if a contracting company was acting in a way that was—I will stay away from the word “negligent”—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes. Therefore, the responsibility would rest with the contracting company. Maybe, if the contractor had gone a bit rogue, the contractor would be responsible.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
So you think that that is covered.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes, I have. I want to pick up on your last point, cabinet secretary. Were you suggesting that, if ecocide could not be proved in court, a prosecution could be achieved using the 2014 act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am trying to think how such a provision would work. The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service might decide to go down the ecocide route to take a case to court, but, during the trial, it might think, “We’re not going to meet the high bar for ecocide,” and decide to switch to a section 40 prosecution. Is that what you are saying? In other words, are you talking about making it possible for someone to be found not guilty of ecocide but then to be retried under section 40 of the 2014 act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
No. I mentioned consent or connivance.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes, and I suggested that neglect should be added.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
If a contracting company was not following proper procedures and then caused an incident, where would the buck stop?