The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2620 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 21 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I was listening, and it was a load of rubbish.
I fear for the future of this policy, given that many of our core businesses and services rely on investment and exports for their futures.
When it comes to inward investment, businesses are looking for certainty and security, and the constant threat of another divisive independence referendum is driving investment away. At this time, supporting our recovery from the pandemic and helping businesses through the global cost of living crisis should be our main priority, not stoking division and dissent and creating borders where none should be. A border between Scotland and England would end the free movement of goods in Great Britain through the imposition of a trade border between Scotland and England, our main trading partner. Independence is never going to happen, but the constant threat of it is harming us and driving investment away.
When I was reading the investment plan last night, I thought that I had missed a chapter. The oil and gas industry has been a key part of our economy and inward investment, but this devolved Government seems to want to airbrush it out of our economy. It is clear to see, when you look at the table in the plan, that wages in the north-east are at the top when it comes to foreign-owned firms. That is down to the energy industry, but this Government seems intent on driving that investment away, just to appease its Green partners. While we still have a need for hydrocarbons, we should be supporting the industry in this country, not relying on imports from other countries. That is better for our jobs and our economy as a whole.
The Finance and Public Administration Committee constantly hears that we are underperforming compared with the rest of the UK, and a big part of that is because of what is happening in the north-east of Scotland, but it is clear that this Government has turned its back on the industry and the north-east.
We have heard a lot from this Government about the energy transition, which greatly affects the north-east, and we have had many debates in the chamber about a just transition. Given our global energy crisis, I welcome the UK Government’s pragmatic approach to developing domestic supplies of the fuel that we need while we move away from fossil fuels and towards sustainable energy. I know that the energy companies in the north-east welcome that approach and see an energy transition as the way forward. The SNP-Green Government would send them off a cliff edge, which would make us more reliant on foreign oil and gas and less able to be self-sufficient. That policy would be detrimental for the economy of the north-east; it would not increase investment but decimate it.
Once again, if this SNP-Green Government is serious about investment in Scotland and growing our exports, it should not pursue the obsession with splitting up the UK and creating uncertainty. Instead, it should support and work with the UK Government and understand that the trading might that we have as a United Kingdom is far greater than we can ever achieve if we split from our largest partner.
16:05Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 21 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
We got this document an hour before the debate, so I will not take any interventions.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Are you saying that, even just to meet the pay settlement that was agreed this year, savings have to be made elsewhere?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
That is because it was not fully funded by the Scottish Government, I guess.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
As does the impact of change on services and people.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Maybe some of that work has not been done yet, but, as you say, it will have to be done before any programme is embarked on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
When I was a councillor, I went along to the COSLA leaders’ meetings. When the tourist tax was discussed, it was always spoken about as something that would be optional for each local authority. Additionality was another key issue. Have we now moved to a place where councils are looking at things such as the tourist tax and the parking tax not as additional sources of income, but to plug the gaps that they have?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Are COSLA members looking at the tourist tax as a way to increase spend on tourism or marketing, for example, or are they now looking at it to plug the gaps that they have?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I will move on, because I know that we are short of time. The COSLA submission talks about the gap in funding that there will be in the next five years and about it being equivalent to having 20,000 fewer local government jobs. Do you think that that is the reality that we will face in five years’ time? Will there be 20,000 fewer local government jobs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Is local government still looking at having 20,000 fewer jobs in the next five years?