The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1963 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes, I have. I want to pick up on your last point, cabinet secretary. Were you suggesting that, if ecocide could not be proved in court, a prosecution could be achieved using the 2014 act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am trying to think how such a provision would work. The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service might decide to go down the ecocide route to take a case to court, but, during the trial, it might think, “We’re not going to meet the high bar for ecocide,” and decide to switch to a section 40 prosecution. Is that what you are saying? In other words, are you talking about making it possible for someone to be found not guilty of ecocide but then to be retried under section 40 of the 2014 act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
No. I mentioned consent or connivance.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Yes, and I suggested that neglect should be added.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
If a contracting company was not following proper procedures and then caused an incident, where would the buck stop?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
Is that explicit enough in the bill so that people understand that, or are changes needed?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Douglas Lumsden
If there was no ecocide law in the rest of the United Kingdom, companies might feel that coming to Scotland would bring an added risk. Do you think that that would not be the case?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am becoming a bit of a regular at the committee. As you said, convener, the driving force behind the petition is Margaret Reid, who was forced to act after watching her sister struggle with postpartum psychosis six years ago. Because of a senseless and arbitrary time limit—her baby was older than one—she could not go to one of Scotland’s two mother and baby units in Livingston and Glasgow. She was sent to a mixed-sex mental health ward, which was traumatic, as you would expect.
Kate Forbes has spoken about her experience with postpartum depression after she became a mum in 2022. She agreed to meet the Reid family in Dundee with the then mental health minister Maree Todd to see the hell that that woman had gone through for herself.
In a written submission to the committee in June 2024, the Minister for Social Care, Mental Wellbeing and Sport wrote:
“I remain committed to ensuring equitable, coordinated access to mental health provision for women, infants and their families throughout pregnancy and during the postnatal period; and appreciate the Committee’s interest”,
but since then there has been nothing. Nothing has been done to address the fact that access to specialist perinatal mental health support is limited to the first year following the birth of a child. That is despite the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee inquiry recommending that access should not be restricted in that way. That was four years ago.
Maree Todd was also asked about the other part of the petition, which is about establishing a mother and baby unit in the north-east of Scotland following a 2022 consultation on the options to achieve parity outside the central belt. I would dearly love to see one in Aberdeen or Dundee. The minister said that the Scottish Government was considering its response. Three years have passed since then.
Postnatal depression affects one in 10 women within a year of giving birth, according to the NHS, and suicide is a leading cause of maternal death during the year after birth, but the issue is not limited to the first year after birth. The petition merely holds the Scottish National Party Government to account for what it has promised—to ensure the same equitable and co-ordinated access that the minister wrote about.
I would appreciate members continuing to consider the petition and asking the minister to appear and provide evidence on what the Scottish Government has done to address the valid concerns that have been raised in the petition, by experts and by MSPs.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Douglas Lumsden
I am sticking with the topic of the costs and benefits. As was mentioned, the costs and benefits at a sectoral level are set out in the draft plan. What are your views on how those have been quantified and presented? Is there enough detail in the plan to enable us to analyse what the costs are?
I put that question to Clare Wharmby first.