The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1570 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I will be quick, because of the time. On the missing records related to the Ferguson Marine contract, how can we be assured that lessons have been learned and improvements made when it comes to record keeping and recording decisions correctly?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I will move on. I have another question about Leslie Evans. She retired at the end of the year, but was paid until the end of March. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2022
Douglas Lumsden
It is my understanding that she was paid until the end of March. Is that correct? I am only trying to get my head around what she was doing that meant that she could not appear before the committee, because she was still an employee.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Would decision makers and investigators take part in that process?
My concern is that there could be two individuals—an agency employee and a staff member—with identical complaints, and one complaint would be handled completely differently from the other. You have explained some of the reasons behind that. Ministers could be criticised because one complaint was not being dealt with effectively because it came from an agency worker.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Would a minister still be aware that a potential complaint was being made from an agency worker?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 April 2022
Douglas Lumsden
I asked about the issue of agency workers at the 25 January meeting and I still have a concern about that. I get that agency workers are not employees—they have their own employer, so the approach needs to be different. However, the new procedure says:
“Propriety & Ethics will take steps to assure that any agency worker with a concern about a Minister’s behaviour can have their issue addressed.”
Will that follow a separate procedure? Will the decision makers and investigators get involved at all in that process?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Thanks for allowing me back in, convener.
When I was reading Anna Fowlie’s blog last night, this stood out:
“We know that investing time and money in prevention is essential if we are to address poverty, inequality and climate change. We have known it for years, even decades, but we don’t make that important shift because the benefits don’t show up within that electoral cycle and it means moving spend from immediate pressures.”
I agree with that completely, but the Government claims to be taking prevention and early intervention seriously. Do you think that it is not doing enough? What more could it do on prevention?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
The link between the NPF and the LOIP is broken; organisations that are aware of the LOIP might be less aware of the NPF, at the national level. We should combine them better so that people are aware of both, not just of one or the other. I do not know how to fix that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Should it be quite clear, as soon as there is an application for funding, how it will align with the NPF? Maybe that is something that is also missing, just now.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 29 March 2022
Douglas Lumsden
Aberdeen City Council has embedded the LOIP at the start of projects. I think that you mention in your report that it should be embedded right at the start of projects.
The way I read the situation is that it is almost as though it is measured how a project has aligned with the NPF at the end, as opposed to the question being asked right at the start how it will achieve the outcomes of the NPF. Do you have any ideas about how we could change that?