The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1491 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
Scotland’s more dispersed population is one of founding principles of the Barnett formula, from which we benefit as well, of course. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
The two examples I used—Philip, sorry, I recognise that we are jumping about a little bit—were about people reducing their hours in the first instance. Some GPs are not working full time and are therefore contributing to massive capacity issues in GP surgeries. That has been a general trend. In the proposals that you have put in place, have you thought about whether increasing those taxes would result in people reducing their hours in key core services essential to help poor people in Scotland?
The other question was about attracting international talent, such as breast cancer surgeons in Tayside, who—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
I will take one step back to the questions that the convener was pushing on. Your response on tax rates was that, essentially, you believe that the jobs involved are sticky. There are two other issues in that. I was speaking to doctors yesterday at general practitioner surgeries in Dundee, and they were telling me that they do not have a head count problem but that nobody works five days, so they have a massive capacity problem and cannot deliver. That is a trend in the workforce anyway. Will the changes in the differential tax rate that you propose not impact on that?
The other thing that I have problems with in Dundee is attracting breast cancer oncologists. You will know that breast cancer rates for the poorest women are much, much worse than those for richer women, so this is actually about poor people. That is an internationally competitive sector, and we are finding it difficult to bring people to Scotland to do that. What modelling have you done or what consideration have you given to whether it is more likely that I will get breast cancer oncologists in Dundee to help those women if we increase those tax rates?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
Any colleague, but I think—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
Mr Sousa, you said in your submission:
“if one assumes that the UK Government will take action to avoid the public finances continuing on an unsustainable path, the Scottish Government’s funding gap looks very different.”
There is a gearing issue here, is there not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
I want to get away from the stickiness side of it, although I think that that is right. However, in this scenario, we are trying to recruit somebody internationally. Are we going to prevent the NHS from being able to do that? Again, it is a key service for the poorest people in Scotland. Have you done any work on how your proposals might have an impact on those two issues?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
Would anybody else like to respond?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
My final question might be more of an observation. On multiyear budgets, you mentioned political instability and the difficulty in 2016. I recall calls for multiyear budgets going back as far as 2010. Looking back, we thought that we had political stability, and the Scottish Government was not delivering multiyear budgets at that point. Is that something that is intrinsic to the political performance of the Scottish Parliament, our institutions and the relationship with local government? I recognise that instability is now the key driving factor, but there is a longer-term problem.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2023
Michael Marra
Even under the relatively stable longer-term budgets, the Scottish Government still did not deliver multiyear funding settlements to Scottish public services prior to 2015. It did not do that. It says in the papers that people called for it in 2013. I am challenging this, because I worry that, although political instability in the UK is the key issue right now, if we cannot deliver multiyear funding it is a big problem. Let us hope that we can do so. Is there something about the way in which this place performs that means that people are more reactive, in setting one-year budgets? I am wondering whether we will not find multiyear funding to be the solution.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
I share some of my colleagues’ concerns—in particular, about the fantastical nature, to use your words, convener, of some of the numbers and, essentially, the public relations claims on some of this. My overall position aligns with the trade union colleagues we saw last week. In their view, there is insufficient engagement from the Government over some of the issues that Ross Greer has raised. However, recognising the fact that we are in a competitive regime, internationally and across the UK, and that our ports have to be competitive if they are going to attract business, I will, somewhat reluctantly, support the SSI at this stage.
The Government could do an awful lot better on exploring the options that are available to it and dealing with some of the questions that I have raised about transparency and decision making across its economic development prospectus, to make sure that we can have confidence in its decisions.