The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
You would not take any expert advice on that tax rate, then.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Do you think that it was worth while?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Jersey has a population of 100,000 people, and the inquiry budget was £23 million. You have already mentioned the budget restraints in social work departments, which, indeed, you have led. At the same time, social workers are protecting lives in those communities, and you were quite conscious of that, too. Would you call it a trade-off?
12:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I will move on. Turning to the advice from the Scottish Fiscal Commission, I was interested to note that, on 1 April, Graeme Roy told our committee that the Scottish Fiscal Commission had not been asked to do any work at all on full fiscal autonomy, which is the stated policy of the Government. He said:
“we have had no instructions on that, so we have not looked at anything like full fiscal autonomy.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 1 April 2025; c 27.]
If that is the policy of the Government, as you set out to the Scottish Affairs Committee, would it not be best to take some professional advice as to what the implications of that might be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
The mechanical principle is that you are pursuing this area of policy with the UK Government and you have a view of what the destination should be for the fiscal framework, but you do not have any idea of what the fiscal impact would be—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I take that—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I appreciate your point, convener, but exploring the issue of—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
Good morning, cabinet secretary. You have touched on issues around the advice that you take in relation to the budget, and I wonder about the tax advisory group’s role in that regard. On what the group made of your changes to income tax, Dan Neidle, who is a member of the group, said:
“Nothing. Because they didn’t ask us. It was pure politics.”
Why would you not ask a tax advisory group, commissioned and chaired by you, for its views on your tax policy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
I just want to follow up on some comments that colleagues have made. First of all, it strikes me that there is an issue with the design of inquiries—I will come to their method in a moment. There is often a lack of trust around the state’s role in the delivery of a service or justice, and the Government is often pushed into a position where, often under pressure, it must find a means of trying to find some solutions to that question. As a result, there is often a bit of a one-size-fits-all process.
It is not just about inquiries being judge led—we have talked about the tendency towards that approach and our perhaps becoming fixated on that aspect. Is it possible that, in different fields, entirely different approaches to dealing with some of those issues might be appropriate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
So, you think that there is a discussion between the chair, once selected, and the Government. There must be a process where, in essence, the Government pre-designs the inquiry, because it must appoint the appropriate person; for a Covid inquiry, that person might be a senior epidemiologist, as the convener suggested, or, for a legal situation, the person might be a judge. There is some pre-construction of what will happen by the Government.