The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
I think that that is illustrative of a lack of transparency, but I will leave it at that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
A letter from Ernst & Young to this committee refers to a report from Shepherd and Wedderburn that, I am led to believe, is about your departure. Is that correct?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
I am not really sure that I do, to be honest. You are claiming some form of legal protection—or some obligation rather than a protection—but I would like to know why you think that you left the university’s employment. Do you accept the rationale for your sacking?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
You do not. Okay.
We might hear a little more about the Shepherd and Wedderburn report, which I asked to have provided to the committee. I know that the convener asked the university to provide that and that the university has taken legal advice on it.
I put the same point to Peter Fotheringham. Your departure from the university has been described to me by various people as the first clear external indication of the turmoil that was going on behind the scenes. Did you leave because things were getting so bad?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Why did you leave?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Dr McGeorge and Mr Fotheringham, you have both mentioned the longer-term challenge that the university faced. There was a cycle of financial problems—certainly not at the level of the existential crisis that the university faces at the moment, but for a long period of time. I am interested in the strategic posture of the university. What was it trying to achieve? Dr McGeorge, what do you think the university was trying to do? Where was it trying to go during the past couple of years?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
The target that was expressed was to be a £500 million turnover organisation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Would you say, Mr Fotheringham, that the drive for growth at that level was a significant mismatch between the underlying structural problems of the institution and what was achievable?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
I hear that, but you were the person with sight of the accounts. You have come to the committee today and said that the University of Dundee had a long-term challenge in this area. As much as you say that, as an institution, you needed that growth, was it not particularly exposed to the risks of that at the same time?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Aspiration is one thing. The Gillies report describes it as “hubris” on the part of the institution, particularly regarding the role of the principal. In the annual report, published in July 2025, he said:
“The year covered in this annual report has been one of consolidation, achievement and continuing recovery from the challenges of the pandemic, and of an institution blooming in the face of considerable ... headwinds.”
That was entirely untrue when he said it in 2025. Is that not right?