The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2056 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
It was not material.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
That is useful. I have a broader question about the use of ScotWind money. There is comment about that on the front page of The Scotsman today, and I believe that you spoke about it at the University of Glasgow yesterday. Is it your understanding that that money will be used for general revenue, rather than for the purposes that have been set out previously around supporting the transition to net zero?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
Given the analysis from the IFS and the Fraser of Allander Institute, that looks unlikely. They are both predicting the likelihood of an in-year emergency budget—they say that that is a fair possibility, given how tight the numbers are. You say that the idea is that the Government will not draw down the money. I know that some of the allocations go into 2027-28, but it feels like one-off spending. Should we have an overall concern that the budget will not get to the end of the year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
There is also the analysis that referenced “heroic assumptions”. We have already heard that in relation to productivity, as well as some of the issues around workforce.
Let us discuss the £1.5 billion of projected savings. We previously heard a figure for that in the MTFS and the fiscal sustainability delivery plan, but, at that point, it was around £1 billion. Has the figure increased or is that just my recollection?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
Two thirds of the figure is from the 3 per cent recurring savings in national health service boards, but my understanding is that that money is retained by the health boards. In what respect is that a saving to the overall budget that allows us to close the fiscal gap between projected expenditure and the amount of money that comes in?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
That is useful. We seem to have taken a half step in that direction.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
I was speaking at the University of Glasgow yesterday, and the anger among stakeholders from various areas was palpable because of the fact that, a week on, they still do not understand the budget allocations for their sectors. That seems to be part of the problem. We have been advocating for this to be done but, by taking a half step and not going the full distance or giving the full picture, it almost feels a bit worse than what we had previously.
Do the other professors have any comments on that? I know that the issue particularly animates Professor Spowage, and rightly so. I will give the specific example of colleges. On the day of the budget statement, the cabinet secretary made great play of colleges, claiming extra funding of £70 million. I have now heard a variety of figures. It looked like it could be £50 million, and it is now potentially down to £40 million, when you take out the amount that was allocated to the single capital project in the college estate in the past seven years or whatever. Is there any clarity on that picture and on the claim that was made versus the reality?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
We can pick that up with the cabinet secretary.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michael Marra
What if that was £90 billion?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Michael Marra
The Scottish Government makes those demands publicly, and they are clearly political demands. The permanent secretary of the Scottish Government wrote to me saying:
“In making representations at UK fiscal events it is not for the Scottish Government to undertake costing of UK Government reserved policies, nor to identify or quantify alternative revenue-raising options.”
Apparently, it is not the job of the head of the Government civil service to make those demands. It is not on you to cost them. I get that you are responsible for costing UK Government policies rather than commenting on the politics of what is happening here, but there is a missing space when one constituent part of the UK is making unfunded demands of the Government and no one is actually costing that out. Are the politics of that not a problem for the operation of the fiscal framework?