The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
That relates to the operational side of things, and I do not think that we have any clarity on any of that. However, the more macro issue is that this “3% recurring savings” action has been written into the document almost as an assumption that those savings will be made in order to meet a target—that is, this £1 billion target that seems to have been set—while, at the same time, it is assumed that health spend will continue to grow. Do you have an understanding of how those two things interact?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
Given that commentary, and given your concerns about the programmes, if, during the budget period, the cabinet secretary were to say to us, “This £1 billion cut has been baked in to close the gap,” would that be an acceptable approach from the Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
Finally, on the MTFS, I think that Mr Sousa mentioned the lack of prioritisation that the convener highlighted; indeed, I think that both of you referred to it in your submissions. Mr Sousa, you say that assuming no prioritisation cannot
“in practice ... really be true, and the MTFS thus continues to seem more like a political statement to manage expectations across the public sector rather than a true setting of the course of public finances”.
Is that a tenable position for the Government to take? Should we see that in the spending review when it is published? Do we need to see some departure in approach to the management of those public accounts?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
We all recognise that the external funding situation has been volatile globally for a long time now. However, what the UK Government and, we are told, the Scottish Government are trying to do through the spending review process is to add some form of medium-term stability for organisations. What has SCVO’s involvement in the spending review process been? Have you been brought into conversations about the process and what you see as likely outcomes of it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
So, you have no real sight of the process. You are a key partner in the delivery of some services and you are asking for some form of stability around that. It strikes me that, if multiyear funding does not happen in this spending review, it will never happen under this Government. This is the period where there is foresight of three years across UK Government funding. We are told that that should be stable—although there are always events and all that comes with those—so now is surely the opportunity.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
How do you foresee the impact of those challenges flowing through the fiscal framework?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
You were privy to the questions to the previous candidate, which were similar, but I will perhaps go on a slightly different tangent but in the same area. What do you believe to be the domestic performance issues rather than the global trends that might impact the performance of the Scottish economy over the medium term?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Michael Marra
I have nothing to declare, deputy convener.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Michael Marra
Professor Bell, the questions that we have been discussing this morning have been—at least, in part—about how we plug the gap that the SFC has identified between the current plans and the revenue. The requests that the committee has seen have related, in part, to further growth on top of that and additional spend on benefits. Do you think that that is realistic?