The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1960 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
You are still working with a heavily paper-based system. Is that correct?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
I would have thought so. What do you think is a reasonable timeframe for somebody to be able to plan for their retirement by getting an estimate from the SPPA?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
At any point?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. Thank you.
11:00Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
I have a constituent who retired in 2015 and was told in September 2021 that they would have their full resolution by October 2022, but they are now being told by your evidence today that it will be 2026. They will have been retired for over 11 years by the point at which there is any remedy to their pension.
This is not just about a lack of certainty. We are talking about a huge chunk of people’s lives in which their lives are diminished, where they are unable to spend the money that they have rightly earned. They are unable to spend it on their children or their grandchildren or to make choices that they wanted to make. Is the word “sorry” in there?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
You will also recognise that there will be people who have died in that period, who had no access.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
Okay.
On general practice, I have also been contacted by constituents regarding the lack of estimates being available to them prior to retirement. In other parts of the UK—you have been keen to lean on them—some of those estimates are available up to 18 months before retirement, but the policy at the SPPA seems to be that people are not allowed an estimate until six months before retirement. Is that the case?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. When do you think that that capacity might be realised within those five years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Michael Marra
In July, you said that the deadline of 31 October remained but that full delivery was expected by 31 December. I do not really know what that means, if I am honest. It does not really make much sense. Either the deadline is kept or it is not.
You have talked about complexity, and a statement that was issued on the Scottish Government website says:
“SPPA has exercised this discretion due to the scale and complexity”.
We have heard quite a bit about that this morning. However, the statement says that that was
“not an indication of lack of progress, but rather a reflection of our commitment to completing the remaining work responsibly and transparently.”
It is a reflection of lack of progress, is it not? It happened because you are not getting the work completed.