The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
Given how you have presented some of your evidence today, you seem like a man who has a bit of a flair for language and presentation, as many people in your position would.
When you left, a copy of a book called “The Spy and the Traitor” was left on your desk at University House, where you had put your keys and staff card. Was that because you felt that there were traitors and you felt betrayed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
The sense that I got from the earlier conversation about your final departure was that you were not very happy about the whole thing. Why did the chair of court feel that you had to leave? Was it because you had caused the situation or because you were not part of the solution to the situation?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
Did she tell you why? “We have lost faith in you” must be about the fact that you had known—as you have set out in the evidence that you have given us today and as we have seen in the Gillies report—that the institution had very significant financial problems since, if we are being generous, early spring 2024.
I have been told by very senior colleagues of yours, such as Professor O’Neill, that there was complete inaction from you between the point that everybody knew and the point that you left in December. We have heard that no action was taken on voluntary severance. You thought that it should happen, but you could not deliver it, in your own words. In other evidence, we were told that you did not think that it should happen at all. The Gillies report says that there were moments when the university could have changed course but did not.
You were not able to deliver any such actions. How would you describe your actions over the period from spring to December, when you departed? What were you doing to try to save 3,000 jobs?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
This has been a catalogue of incompetence. Today’s meeting has been littered with the phrases “should have” and “could have”. Your successor, Shane O’Neill, has now left his post as principal because he is deemed to have been complicit in the debacle of your leadership and what has happened. Your predecessor but one—there was a small interim period within that—Andrew Atherton, also had to leave his position.
Do you think that there is a structural problem such that we cannot get proper leadership for this outstanding group of staff and students?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
You started the evidence session by saying that
“The university found itself in an invidious financial situation.”
You put the institution in an invidious financial situation, did you not, through uncontrolled expenditure, a lack of ability to realise savings and a lack of realistic predictions around international recruitment? The jobs of 3,000 people are at risk, and the taxpayer is on the hook for £122 million, as a result of that grotesque level of failure. You have said that you apologise. Do you take responsibility for that level of financial vandalism?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
You had no grip on expenses policy; no grip on the covenants; no grip on savings; no grip on expenditure; and no grip on governance. That is what we have heard in your evidence today, Mr Gillespie. You have a lot of well-informed views about the international recruitment market; it seems that that was the thing that you were concerned about.
You were absent. The day after you resigned, you were due to fly off to China again, were you not? That would have been your 14th international trip within that year. Were you not an absent landlord?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
So why did you think that those people would keep coming?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
Professor Gillespie, you talk about analytical discussions but, at that time, headcount at the university was continuing to rise. We have that in our evidence. The number of people who were employed there was climbing and climbing. There were £35 million of savings identified in the budget that you had signed off and there was no action to deliver against any of them.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 June 2025
Michael Marra
That is the characterisation that you are giving in your evidence.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
That is not part of the core business of the university, is it? The core business of the university is teaching people, research and some level of knowledge exchange. Building incubator buildings, as fantastic and important as they might be, is not the job of the university, is it?