The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2056 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
That would be useful.
You mentioned in previous answers that pro formas were being prepared by cabinet secretaries. Can you provide those to the committee?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
From a policy perspective, the stated intention for that money was that it was to be used for net zero transition, particularly in the north-east, for investment in skills and infrastructure, to ensure that we have that economy functioning in the future. However, you are saying that it is really being used to prop up the revenue budget on a one-off basis, rather than being a recurring investment in the future.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
Okay, that is useful. We have touched on the big tax changes, the fiscal drag and the numbers around those issues. In her statement, the cabinet secretary made great play of the tax change, despite a member of her tax advisory group saying that it
“may be the smallest tax cut in history”.
That seems to bolster the claim that Scots will pay less tax than people in the rest of the UK. The SFC has been caught up a bit in that discussion, due to the use of some of its statements. Are you comfortable saying that ministers have always made accurate and truthful statements regarding the SFC’s position on matters?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
At Christmas, I was telling family members and friends that Dundee United would definitely win the new year derby. I was basing that on the data in front of me and my perspective. That was my prediction about what would happen. We lost 1-0, however—and rightly so. The reality is that, if I continued to claim that we had won, I would be a liar, would I not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
I will start with the issue of transparency and comparability, which Professor Spowage commented on in the aftermath of the budget. You heard the evidence that we took in the first session regarding some of the changes to reporting against the autumn budget revisions and so on. What impact has that had on the transparency of the budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
The colleges welcomed the £70 million but if, within a week, it is now £40 million, that is a significant challenge. Of course, that is nowhere near meeting the 20 per cent real-terms reduction over the past five years that the Auditor General has set out. Is that £40 million figure accurate, as you understand it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
Professor Heald, you said to the convener that a new Government, or this Government even, should stick to the current spending plans across the year. There has been significant commentary from your colleague Professor Spowage at the Fraser of Allander Institute and from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, saying that we could anticipate that there might have to be an in-year adjustment or another Scottish fiscal event within the year. We have become quite used to those, as there have been three in the past four years, and my understanding is that there was an internal one last year, rather than a public statement. That is partly because of the issues of managing the pressures that you have been exploring. Given the headwinds that the Government faces, is it a significant risk that, in essence, it is relying on something coming up within the year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
Professor Bell, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said that the current spending plan might not get to the autumn. Do you share that concern?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
We have touched on the spending review a few times. Professor Spowage said earlier that the timing of UK Government’s spending review was not under the control of the Scottish Government, which might have concerns about that. The spending review was published on 11 June last year, and it took the UK Government 14 months to prepare it. Was there any reason why a spending review could not have been undertaken in Scotland prior to the publication of the UK spending review, at least in terms of methodology and taking a zero-based approach? Yes, we have the global figures and the UK’s conclusions about what was allocated, but building a methodology from the ground up in order to look at where we are getting value for our budget and what we are looking at could have been done at that point, could it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Michael Marra
Is what we have ended up with in the Scottish spending review a satisfactory document that allows organisations throughout Scotland to have sight of what they have to do?