The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1714 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
The GERS figures for 2023-24 show that the net fiscal balance was -£22.7 billion—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
That is 10.4 per cent of gross domestic product.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Michael Marra
You are talking about a move to independence and the assignation of the fiscal element, but the expert opinion is that such a shift in the constitution would have significant negative effects. You are acting to pursue full fiscal autonomy, but your Government has undertaken no analysis, despite the fact that the GERS figures are your figures—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Michael Marra
I think that it potentially would, convener. You are right in that a lot of considerable variables move in a UK budget and there is often a very tight timetable between the publishing of an autumn budget in the UK and the need for the Scottish Parliament to look at a budget before the end of the year. There is a very tight timescale in which to do that work. In the absence of longer-term fiscal statements or planning strategies, some of the known knowns—pay progression assumptions that might be made, the size of the public workforce over the following year, how many people will be involved and how much progressions are likely to account for—could be foregrounded more. A cabinet secretary has told the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee that the Government knew that the assumptions it was making on pay last year were unrealistic and that it was a paper exercise. That was a pretty frank admission from Gillian Martin.
Is it partly about the absence of an MTFS since 2023? Could that be a better process for helping people to understand the structure?
11:15Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Michael Marra
The discussion about negotiations around public pay is useful, because it speaks to a lot of the evidence we have had from the cabinet secretary, which Craig Hoy highlighted. Public pay accounts for more than 50 per cent of the Scottish Government’s expenditure. On a strategic level—and going back to where you started, Dr Hosie, on the transparency of the budget process—the committee has found that part of the challenge is in being unable to scrutinise the overall spending of the Scottish Government in the absence of a public sector pay policy. We did not have a public sector pay policy for two years, although we have had one recently.
I am trying to pull the conversation more towards the strategic side by asking how we can improve the transparency around public sector pay in the longer term, so that we can scrutinise those bigger figures. Dave Moxham and Dr Hosie, is there more action that we could take to get the Government to be more forthright and open about the assumptions that it is working on?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
Would your organisation be concerned about recommendations to change the fiscal rules to carry more debt?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
You have touched on this a little bit already, but could you say what you think the consequences are of the fiscal rules not being met by the Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
Do you model any potential consequences of changes to those policies?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. You mentioned that a fairly significant change to the fiscal rules was made after the election in the autumn budget. Do you think that it would have been realistic to see another set of fiscal rules at the time of the spring statement?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Michael Marra
What was the period running up to the changes in fiscal rules that were made back in the autumn like? Those changes must have presented you with a whole set of different work to do in terms of producing new models under the new fiscal rules. Was there a conversation with Government, or did Government bring you the rules and you then just changed the models?