The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 760 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Good morning, panel, and thank you for your opening statements.
I want to ask about lowering the minimum age at which a person can apply for legal gender recognition. I think that I am correct in saying that the Scottish Trans Alliance has welcomed that, but it has also stated:
“there should also be provisions for individuals struggling with their application to request support, and these should be especially sensitive to those under 18 who may be applying without the support of their parent or guardian.”
The alliance then goes on to say:
“explainers ... on ... what a GRC means, and how it could be used would ... be helpful”.
Do you think that, if individuals of a certain age are unable to understand
“what a GRC means, and how it could be used”
and require additional support to understand and submit an application, it might be unwise to lower the minimum age? That question is for Vic Valentine, first of all.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Colin, do you have anything to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Going back to what Dr Crawford said about support and something that Vic Valentine said about having explainers, that suggests that you are looking at having a much wider support mechanism. If you are looking at people who have disabilities and need extra help, that cannot just be an explainer on a piece of paper. Support services will have to be provided to say what a GRC is and what it means. Am I right that you are saying that what is needed is more than just explainers and descriptions?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have a follow-up question. I asked the first panel a question about prisoner services. You mentioned a situation in which discrimination could occur, regardless of whether the person had a GRC. I will try to word this right: where does the onus lie when it comes to the Prison Service deciding where somebody should go?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
If there was no GRC, how would one protect women prisoners from men who say that they are women in order to transfer prisons? What are your thoughts on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you. Dr Crawford, do you have anything to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I thank Melanie Field for her opening statement. The Scottish Government asserts that the bill will not change rights under the 2010 act, but it has not produced a reasoned explanation for its position. The EHRC’s letter of July 2021 to the Trans Legal Project says:
“we think that it is unlikely that a trans person without a GRC can claim direct discrimination on the grounds of gender reassignment if they are denied access to a single or separate sex service that corresponds with their lived gender.”
The EHRC has since revisited its guidance on single-sex spaces and services. Will you provide an update on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2022
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I support amendments 2, 3 and 5 in the name of the cabinet secretary, as they improve clarity around who will receive a pardon as well as widen the scope of the pardon appropriately, even if that is likely to affect only a small number of people.
The bill, as introduced, contains some ambiguities around qualifying conduct. As a result, I have lodged amendment 15, which, alongside amendments 9, 10 and 11 in the name of my colleague Alexander Stewart, seeks to remove some of the potential for the bill to be misinterpreted and for an individual to mistakenly believe that they have received a pardon. As the improved drafting in amendment 3, in the name of the cabinet secretary, will also achieve that goal, I am happy to support that amendment, regardless of the fact that it pre-empts other amendments in the group.