The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1895 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Given your mention of resources, are you concerned about the resourcing of the national care service, given the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s concerns about the total cost as well as the concerns that have been expressed about the Scottish Government’s budget, which we will hear about later in the week?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Good morning to the panel. I will pick up on what Adam Stachura said about the cabinet secretary’s accountability for social care. Would you contend that local councillors are not currently accountable in that way and that people would have a better chance of holding the whole system to account via the 129 members of the Scottish Parliament than they would through our hundreds of councillors? I have to be honest and say that it can be challenging for MSPs to hold health boards to account. In my 10 years as a councillor, I often found it easier to hold social care providers to account. Could you expand on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
It was just about whether things could be done now in terms of the Feeley agenda.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Thank you. I will pick up on co-design. To what extent have people felt involved in co-design thus far? Should there have been more co-design before we got to the draft bill? What should co-design look like in the future? Perhaps Alison Leitch could comment from a family perspective before we come to the other side of the table.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
I wonder whether I can briefly pivot to Cathie Russell on that question. She mentioned the Feeley review. Are there things that could be done now, outwith the bill, that would make a difference?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Of course.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Thank you; that is very helpful.
I move on to talk about the whole concept of care boards. Do you feel that there is still too little detail around what they will do and what their composition will be, including who will have the voting rights in them? I go to Dr Manji first.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Good morning, panel. The first section in our briefing paper for the meeting is titled “General hopes and fears”. That is a broad theme, but I am keen to understand the concerns that people might have about how the bill has been structured and came to be.
Over our evidence sessions, we have heard significant concern about the bill being a piece of framework legislation and the detail being co-designed after the bill has been passed. I will quote Tanith Muller, chair of the Neurological Alliance of Scotland, who said:
“Scotland is being offered a new structure for care—but without blueprints, a schedule or a budget. We can’t tell if it will even stand up, much less that it will meet the care needs of people in Scotland. Ministers need to go back to the drawing board and show us all the plans that they have developed with people before they ask MSPs to legislate.”
I know that MND Scotland is a member of the Neurological Alliance, so I ask Susan Webster whether she shares some of those concerns, and to say what could have been done differently.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Susan, you have pre-empted my next question, which is on the consensus that came out of the Feeley review. Given the nature of a condition such as MND, would you have preferred to see more action being taken more quickly on some of the issues that were raised in the review, particularly on the workforce, non-residential care charges and support for people and their families?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Paul O'Kane
Should there have been more co-design before the bill was introduced? What co-design would you like to see included in secondary legislation?