The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1537 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Katy Clark
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
You will know that we have created other stand-alone offences that are not used as often as we might have expected. There are reasons for that. Therefore, how an offence is framed and scoped is really important. Our second panel of witnesses might focus on those aspects, but I wonder whether any of you has a view on them. My point is that we could create a stand-alone offence, but it might not make the difference that you are expecting.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
From our consideration of other issues, we know that just because certain behaviours might constitute criminal offences does not necessarily mean that they will be fully investigated or that they will lead to prosecutions or convictions. Are you satisfied that, in Scotland, whenever cases of the nature that you describe are raised with the justice authorities—the police, usually—serious attempts are made to prioritise them, to investigate and to bring charges where possible? We have heard about evidential problems in securing convictions, or even in getting cases as far as court. For example, there have been several legal developments in the type of evidence that is needed to secure a rape conviction, such as changes to the law on corroboration.
In that context, we might decide to keep the existing law, or we might create a new offence. In the latter event, the framing of such an offence would be important, so that people would know what evidence would be required to prove it. Have you thought about improvements in the law that you might seek, which could lead to prosecutions and convictions, whether that is within the range of current offences, including attempted murder, or a stand-alone offence? What would the charge for a stand-alone offence look like? What should the committee push for as regards the content of such an offence?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
I echo Rona Mackay’s comments about how the campaigning work is cutting through.
If a political decision was taken to go ahead with creating a stand-alone offence, how should that be framed? Based on what has been said about defences and consent, should it be a strict liability offence? If so, how would that operate, given what has been said about rough sex? Would intent to cause harm, negligence or recklessness be factors? If there were a decision to go ahead, what advice can you give about how the offence could be framed, beyond any concerns that you have already expressed?
I would be interested in hearing your thoughts, Dr Forbes, although you might feel that you have already expressed those fully.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
Of course.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
That is okay.
12:15Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
If a political decision was taken to go down that path, do you suggest that there would have to be intent to cause harm or recklessness as to whether there would be harm?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
I understand what you are saying—thank you. Do witnesses want to add any comments?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on what impact the national strategy for economic transformation is having on the economy of the West Scotland region. (S6O-04678)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Katy Clark
North Ayrshire has the lowest job density in Scotland. Does the minister believe that the Scottish Government is doing enough to prioritise North Ayrshire, given those poor job density levels? What more can be done to encourage investment and well-paid jobs in the area?