The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1603 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Katy Clark
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. There was a problem with the app, but I believe that I voted yes.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Katy Clark
I appreciate that you might not have hard data, but do you have an impression of how often a different decision is taken when, essentially, the facts are the same?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Katy Clark
How many redeterminations and appeal decisions are based on new information rather than simply a different view being taken of the same facts? Given the complexity of, for example, the adult disability payment, we are interested in whether it is reasonable for different decision makers to come to different conclusions on the same facts. Can you comment on the extent to which new information changes outcomes?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Katy Clark
Lesley Black, you might want to respond to that question, but I have another question that I would also like to put to you.
Based on what we have heard, it seems that, often, redeterminations and appeals are based on further information that has been provided. How easy would it be to try to obtain that information during the initial decision making? Do you have any suggestions on how we could address that, so that the information is captured at the earliest possible stage?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Katy Clark
Thank you. Does anyone else want to come in on that question?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Katy Clark
Gayle Devlin, do you want to come in to conclude this part of the questioning?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Katy Clark
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on what action it is taking to help resolve the industrial dispute by lecturers. (S6O-03342)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Katy Clark
Lecturers have been taking action short of strike action since February. Despite that action being lawful, colleges have been threatening to deduct up to 100 per cent of lecturers’ pay, even when they attend work as normal. Does the minister agree that that is completely unacceptable?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Katy Clark
Surely the point is not the length of the bill but the number of system changes that are proposed in it.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Katy Clark
I thank the cabinet secretary for that intervention, and I look forward to the Scottish Government bringing forward proposals for provisions in the text of the bill that would enable that to be a reality not just over the current or subsequent session of Parliament but as the decades unfold.
We welcome the Scottish Government’s willingness to consider the idea of having a panel of three judges rather than a single judge. That was raised by the committee in respect of the rape trial pilot. However, we are concerned that we still do not have criteria for such a pilot. I know that the cabinet secretary has said that those criteria will come forward, but it would have been helpful if the committee had had that information during its extensive consideration of the legislation over many months.