The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1537 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Katy Clark
Would you say that they are not being implemented at all, or are there pockets of implementation?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Katy Clark
I am going to ask about fatal accident inquiries, but before we focus on that, do any other witnesses have anything to add on why we have such high numbers of drug-related deaths in Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Katy Clark
You have already said that there is significant resource across the sector. It is about how that resource is used as well, is it not?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Katy Clark
Do any of the witnesses have an explanation as to why the necessary action has not been taken?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Katy Clark
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on what it is doing to address violence in schools. (S6O-04755)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Katy Clark
I agree that no young person aged under 18 should be in prison. However, we need to ensure that there are adequate numbers of places in secure units for justice referrals. In recent decades, we have seen a change in the profile of young people in secure units. For example, there are now larger numbers of young women in such units for non-judicial disposals, such as concern about self-harming. What work is the cabinet secretary doing across Government to ensure that an adequate number of the 78 places are available for justice referrals?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Katy Clark
In a survey conducted among teachers by the NASUWT trade union, eight in 10 respondents said that they had been threatened with a weapon by a pupil in the previous 12 months, and 37 per cent said that they had been assaulted with a weapon. The cabinet secretary has said that the Government is working on guidance. Does she think that the action plan is working? What role does she believe that the police should have in addressing the issue? We are often told that schools are discouraged from contacting the police, even in serious cases.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Katy Clark
Your preference would be that the affirmative procedure is used in relation to the delegated subordinate legislation.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Katy Clark
You are comfortable with the consultation of the Electoral Commission, Electoral Management Board or other relevant bodies—is that right?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Katy Clark
Would those instruments be subject to the affirmative or negative procedure? What would the scrutiny process be, and what would Parliament’s role be in the creation of those offences? I know that you have very strong views on that issue in relation to other arenas, and I suspect that in many situations you would prefer powers to be set out in a bill because that requires more scrutiny. Have you thought about that in this context?