Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1537 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission

Meeting date: 19 December 2024

Katy Clark

Will you give an indication of when the longer-term forecasts—that is, those that go beyond five years—might be incorporated into your work programme and when we can get that information? Are we likely to get that information by next summer? You are doing other work; I do not know whether you are able to programme that in now.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Katy Clark

Cabinet secretary, I warmly welcome the regulations that you have brought to the committee today. As you know, Pauline McNeill and I have been calling for some time for GPS monitoring to be introduced in Scotland. The legislation was passed in 2019, and it would be helpful to understand why it has taken so long to get to this point. I appreciate that the position is far from unique, and that there are often delays between legislation being passed and the policy being implemented, but it would be helpful for the committee to get a better understanding as to why there have been such delays.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 18 December 2024

Katy Clark

Given the problems that we have in relation to overcrowding in prisons, those kinds of tools are incredibly important. However, GPS monitoring is already used widely in England and across Europe, and has been for many years. There must be much that can be learned from that.

Cabinet secretary, could you give us an indication of the timetable? Many of us are frustrated because it has been many years that the tool has not been put into operation, so it would be helpful to know how soon such monitoring will be in place. Could you provide us with an update on that?

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Katy Clark

The First Minister confirmed in his letter to me, dated 6 November, that there remain five extant FOI cases relating to the evidence to James Hamilton’s investigation. Does the minister accept that, although there has been significant improvement in reducing the backlog in FOI cases, it is in these highly political situations with ministerial involvement that requested information is being withheld?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Katy Clark

I just want to understand. That is the number of people who are registered on the system, but we know that, in recent years, the number of victims who have been notified is very low. Has there been a significant increase in the number of victims who have registered in recent months?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Katy Clark

Thank you. The concern is that only a small number—a small percentage—of victims have been notified in the past, and many victims would like to be notified but have not registered, for whatever reason. It is often because they are asked only at the beginning of the case, when it is not necessarily something that they are focusing on.

Can you explain that figure of 3,057 and whether it is significantly different? I understand that you do not have the figures in front of you, but is there any reason to believe that there is going to be a significant increase in the number of victims who get notified when there is a significant change in future?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Katy Clark

No; I am asking about the figure that you have just given us.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Katy Clark

I am trying to understand the figures that you have provided today and how they relate to information that we were provided with previously. You said that 3,075 individuals are on the victim notification scheme. Is that correct? Reference was also made to 25 per cent of victims being on the scheme. I appreciate that there are three schemes, and there was also reference to other figures. You can correct me, but that is the information that you have given today.

I am trying to understand the gap between the number of those who are registered on the system—I appreciate what has been said about trying to increase that number—and the number of those who are notified. According to the figures that we were given previously, 477 offenders were released during the early releases in the summer, but only five victims were notified. That seems to be the pattern. The number of victims who get information on release seems to be very low. I know that you listed all the different types of notification that can be given and the different organisations that are involved, but could you confirm that, at the moment, notification levels are low? Could you outline what they are, either today or in correspondence after the meeting, so that we can understand the nature of the problem that we are trying to address?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Katy Clark

It came from your colleague Lucy Smith.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 11 December 2024

Katy Clark

I hope that the convener does not mind me asking about this. Some of my amendments to the bill propose that it should be more of an opt-out scheme than an opt-in scheme, which some lobbying organisations have argued for. It would be interesting to understand whether you have looked at that and why you seem to have taken the view that you do not wish to go down that avenue. What difference do you consider that having an opt-out scheme would make to the uptake, compared to the proposals that you are making?