The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1800 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
We are straying from the central issue about whether it should be a pardon or quashing, but I understand the point that you have made. Do any of the other witnesses want to make any points on quashing convictions or a pardon?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
There are currently a range of offences that deal with issues such as human trafficking and the running of brothels, which the bill does not seek to change. Is there a need to strengthen or otherwise reform other offences that are relevant to prostitution?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
That is helpful. Do any of the other witnesses have a view on whether the offences in the 1982 act should be repealed?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
That is helpful.
The bill seeks to quash existing convictions. I know that Emma Forbes has concerns about that, and one alternative that has been suggested is that people who have been convicted should be pardoned. What are your views on the quashing of existing convictions and the alternative of a pardon?
I will go to Dr Forbes to start, given that she has already expressed a view.
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
I understand the distinctions that you make. Are there any other reasons why you feel that it would be wrong to quash existing convictions? I have heard other reasons given for that, and I want to be absolutely clear whether that is the reason that the Law Society of Scotland takes the position that it is taking, or whether it has any other concerns. Is it just that the Law Society believes that, if the evidence was there at the time and there was an offence at the time, it would be inappropriate to quash the conviction, although it is appropriate to pardon. I fully understand the point that you make, but does the Law Society of Scotland have any other reason for its point of view, or have you articulated the position?
10:15Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
Therefore, you are saying that those 600 community police officers primarily would be community focused. I appreciate that they might get called off to do other things on occasion, such as when there is a big event, but, in broad terms, they would be focused in communities, so you would hope that that would increase the visibility of policing in communities and the feeling in communities that they are getting a better service. What kind of impact would 600 officers make across Scotland?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Katy Clark
Do you think that that would be sufficient to make a tangible difference?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Katy Clark
Since 2006, there has been a 44 per cent decrease in the number of bus routes across Scotland, and 190 routes have been cut in the past year alone. More than 83 per cent of passengers support the idea of Strathclyde Partnership for Transport implementing bus franchising across the region, which would allow for better oversight of fares, routes and timetables. What work is the Scottish Government doing to ensure that SPT has the necessary financial support to enable it to proceed with franchising?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Katy Clark
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the decision by Strathclyde Partnership for Transport to progress with proposals for bus franchising. (S6O-05042)
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Katy Clark
The evidence in relation to proper resourcing is extremely helpful and is important for everybody in the debate to understand. However, many of us will be looking carefully at the provisions on paying for sex, because that is probably the area where there is the biggest divide in people’s views. We will be looking at what evidence we can find in relation to how that model or other models might impact on levels of prostitution, violence against women and human trafficking. I know that you have already said quite a bit about that in relation to other questions, but any further information that you can give us would be helpful.
The previous witnesses made a point about the impact of prostitution on wider society, and I think that we need to think about that carefully. How would you respond to the points that were made about the attitudes of prostitutes’ clients towards prostitutes and the more general issues about the objectification of women and the increased normalisation of pornography in our society? This Parliament has been considering the increased levels of sexism and misogyny, the attitudes of young men and young women, and what that means for society more generally—it is a massive issue. I am asking about what the Parliament tells people in Scotland is acceptable and the impact that that has on how people behave.