The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1673 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
There was a case in 2014 in which a child died in West Lothian: baby J. I have raised the case on a few occasions. Social workers and a nurse attempted to put the child on the child protection register and others decided that he should not be. What went wrong and why that happened is still not clear, but I suppose that it illustrates the point that you are making, which is that this can happen with or without registration.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
Absolutely. This question is probably for Martin MacLean.
Last year, your Police Scotland colleague Bex Smith told the committee about significant legislative gaps in relation to child sexual abuse and exploitation, and she gave a couple of examples. She said:
“there is no Scottish legislation that is specific to prohibited images”
and
“The current criteria for an application for a risk of sexual harm order does not cover online offences.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 18 May 2022; c 37.]
A year has now passed since then. The former Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans, Keith Brown, told the committee that the Scottish Government had indeed engaged with the Crown Office on the particular concerns that your colleague raised. He said to us in writing that the Scottish Government is assessing the Crown’s feedback and will meet Police Scotland in due course to discuss a response to the issues that it has raised.
A year down the line, we would like to know whether you have had that meeting and that feedback yet. Do you know what the Crown’s position is in response to the requests that your colleague raised? Was its position put in writing? If so, could we see that? Where are we at?
There is quite a lot in there. I am sorry.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
Those two elements seem to have been dealt with. However, in Police Scotland’s written submission for this particular session, four serious issues that relate to indecent images of children are identified. They include
“Extreme Pornographic Material/Prohibited Images (CGI, cartoons etc.)”,
“Child-like Sex-Dolls”
and
“Preparatory Acts & Collection of Relevant Information”—
I am not entirely sure what that means. There are still legislative gaps there.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
That will be policing, but is there additional training for health boards and social work?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
Good morning. I would also like to put on record that I am very pleased that the United Kingdom Government has secured the prestigious event and decided to host it in Glasgow. I agree with the Minister for Security, Tom Tugendhat, who says that it
“underlines the UK’s role as a global leader when it comes to security and policing”.
I am grateful to all the members who have supported my parliamentary motion, which I have taken the opportunity to briefly plug.
I was going to ask the same question that Jamie Greene asked about the road traffic accident exemption. Do you know whether the exemption was arrived at due to the high-profile case in which a young man was killed by an overseas diplomat in the UK?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
I have another, more general, question. Is this pretty much the same situation as COP26 and there is no meaningful difference to the exemptions in the order?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
Okay. Thank you.
Another ask is for a Scottish deterrence campaign. Again, there is a difference. There is no campaign currently, but similar things are happening elsewhere. Do you know whether that is progressing?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
That is helpful. Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Russell Findlay
There is another interesting thing in the child protection statistics. In Scotland, 22 children per 100,000 are on the child protection register, but the figure is significantly higher elsewhere in the UK—it is 43 in England, 45 in Northern Ireland and 52 in Wales. I do not quite know what to make of those figures. I do not know whether they mean that there is an overly cautious approach elsewhere and children are being added on grounds that would not be used to add children in Scotland or whether they mean that Scotland is sometimes not adding children when they, arguably, should be added. It is such a stark difference. I do not know whether that question would be for the NSPCC or Barnardo’s or Social Work Scotland.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Russell Findlay
I will be selective. The letter from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service says:
“SCTS successfully achieved customer service excellence”.
I have no idea what that is, so it would be good to know. We have asked the SCTS about its complaints process and been told how wonderful it all is, but there is no data about the number of complaints, whether that number is going up or down, or how complaints are resolved. That might be interesting to know.
I have a few other points about the letters from COSLA and the SFRS, but I will leave those for now.