The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2101 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. I will move on to ask some detailed questions about advocacy. Laura Pasternak, I will start with you and then go to Margaret Smith.
The advocacy provisions in the bill, which are mainly in section 4, is shaped by a lot of secondary legislation. Some of the responses that we have had highlight the potential for confusion with section 18, which relates to information on advocacy in the hearings system. Is there anything that you think absolutely needs to be in the bill? Margaret Smith talked about a definition of independent advocacy. Should anything else on advocacy be in the bill? How does it relate to information on advocacy in the hearings system?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On the lifelong advocacy point, do you think that we need further information in the bill about when someone has access to advocacy and who has access to advocacy, or do you think that regulation is the space in which to do that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. On that, do you think that it should be independent advocacy or legal advocacy?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Laura Pasternak, how would that approach interact with an approach involving independent advocacy?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Lynne O’Brien, you said in your evidence that many professionals who are already involved in young people’s lives will consider themselves to be advocating for the young person. Do you see a distinction between some of those professionals and an independent advocate?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, convener; that is noted. I will get straight to it because of time.
Laura Pasternak, you said earlier that there were some things did not make it into the bill. Can you give us some idea of what those might be? Obviously, should the bill get through stage 1, there will be an opportunity for amendments at stage 2.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you, Laura. Before I turn to you, Margaret Smith, I will ask Matt Forde about how the role of advocacy could work for infants and babies.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is that what you mean by an infant safeguarder?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
To go back to the original question, do we need amendments to the bill to achieve some of those things in education, housing and employment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
If you do not mind, another point on advocacy relates to section 4(4), which you have said should be amended to ensure that the right to advocacy can be only expanded, rather than limited, by secondary legislation. Will you expand on that?