Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 24 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1165 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Female Participation in Sport and Physical Activity

Meeting date: 25 April 2023

Paul Sweeney

So there might be people who would love to spend their days writing about their sport as well as participating in it, but they might not have the opportunity. We could consider whether there were any ways of joining those things up.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Female Participation in Sport and Physical Activity

Meeting date: 18 April 2023

Paul Sweeney

That was really powerful. I know that there is a contrast with Olympic and Commonwealth events, which are quite well resourced. Priyanaz Chatterji, do you have a view on what is happening in cricket? We can bring in other witnesses afterwards.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Female Participation in Sport and Physical Activity

Meeting date: 18 April 2023

Paul Sweeney

That is really powerful; thank you. Lee Craigie, do you have an insight on that from the cycling perspective?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Female Participation in Sport and Physical Activity

Meeting date: 18 April 2023

Paul Sweeney

In the context of cycling being a well-resourced sport, I am thinking of Beth Shriever, who had to crowdfund her way to a gold medal in BMX at Tokyo.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Female Participation in Sport and Physical Activity

Meeting date: 18 April 2023

Paul Sweeney

Thank you for your insights into the quite different economics behind each of the sports. As a follow-up to your points about income and precarity in different sports, what would good look like for you in your particular sport? What would that perfect balance look like? What business model would the sport need to use to achieve that? Do you have any insights as to where it needs to move to? I ask Gemma Fay to kick us off.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Female Participation in Sport and Physical Activity

Meeting date: 18 April 2023

Paul Sweeney

I want to reflect on the point that was touched on earlier about Olympic and Commonwealth games. It seems to me that, in many ways, the watershed for British in sport is Atlanta 1996, when we had our worst-ever performance. I think that the UK came 36th in the medal table, with one gold medal and 15 medals overall.

After that, there was a transformation, with the pumping in of lottery funding into those sports. It is fair to say that the funding has been disproportionately targeted at sports that the UK or team GB regard as having the best prospects for medals, so cycling, women’s swimming and athletics achieve the lion’s share of lottery funding or UK sport funding.

Do you see that as having a direct impact on the transformation of societal regard for those sports, particularly with regard to the 2012 Olympic games and the 2014 Commonwealth games? Could sports such as judo benefit from greater investment in that way? Would that security and that focus on excellence and coaching build a performance level similar to that which has been achieved for those other sports? That is improving public perception and increasing engagement with and interest in those sports. Has it created a virtuous cycle for them?

I will start with Eilidh Doyle, because of her background, and it would also be good to hear from the witness with a background in cycling.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Scrutiny of NHS Boards (NHS Golden Jubilee National Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Highland)

Meeting date: 28 March 2023

Paul Sweeney

That is great.

I also ask all of you whether you can provide an update on your repair backlog and capital investment programme to deal with that and cost avoidance efforts. As they say, a stitch in time saves nine. I am interested to know what proactive efforts are under way to address the repair backlog in your estates.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Scrutiny of NHS Boards (NHS Golden Jubilee National Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Highland)

Meeting date: 28 March 2023

Paul Sweeney

Are there opportunities in relation to your retained estate to achieve capital returns from disposal of surplus estates or investment in surplus estates for other purposes, such as the former acute hospital site at Stobhill or the east house at Gartnavel?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Female Participation in Sport and Physical Activity

Meeting date: 28 March 2023

Paul Sweeney

My questions here have been covered; I have nothing further.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Scrutiny of NHS Boards (NHS Golden Jubilee National Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Highland)

Meeting date: 28 March 2023

Paul Sweeney

A major outcome of the pandemic has been the increase in mental health conditions and demand for the associated services. We note that the recent budget allocation of £290 million for mental health funding restored the £38 million provision that was cut as part of the emergency budget review. Although that is welcome, it is still, in effect, a freeze on funding for mental health across the national health service in Scotland. That is being compounded by recent announcements such as Glasgow health and social care partnership’s announcement of a £22 million cut in its service provision and the consequent loss of 197 positions. I am sure that that will be carried on across Scotland.

I invite the witnesses to comment on whether that will have practical impacts on their service delivery. Is that a bit of a false economy across the public service provision for mental health in Scotland? My impression is that, in many areas, we are robbing Peter to pay Paul. As chief executives, do you share that impression?