The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1165 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
That is a helpful point about balance.
I also want to touch on an issue that has been raised with previous panels about barriers to women accessing sport at elite level and the pathways for that access. Do you have any examples of women facing those barriers? The examples that have been cited are mainly about the ability to maintain an income that enables the person to participate and to sustain their participation at an elite level. Are there any good models or exemplars from one sport that could be carried over into other sports? Do you have any insights into how we can capture best practice in that regard?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
Will you be able to share your findings from your work in this area once the causal factors become more obvious?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
That would be great.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
David Ferguson, you touched on the issue of the data picture in Scotland. Do you, and the other witnesses, believe that that picture is sufficient to measure female participation in sport? Is the data in a form that is collected centrally and collated and analysed? Is there any opportunity to further improve that? Are we making informed decisions? How does the data look to you, and how could it be improved?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
Do we need to do more to feed that back, particularly to local authorities? It seems to me that a lot of decisions are end-of-year financial decisions because, in order to balance a budget, there is a menu of pretty painful decisions that have to be made. Those decisions are not necessarily well informed about whether cutting something to save £X is pushing the problem somewhere else in the system, which might cause exclusion from sport and, therefore, mental health and physical health impacts. Is that something that we need to improve in Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
I want to touch on the fact that the sickness absence rate at the hospital exceeds the 5 per cent target—it is 7.68 per cent. To what do you attribute that? What additional support has been provided to improve the mental health of staff?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
I thank the minister for that. She has made an important point about pay in the sector being a big challenge.
A couple of weeks ago, I visited the Prince & Princess of Wales hospice in Glasgow. It has a 16-bed facility. A third of that cannot be used because of staff shortages, particularly of specialist nurses. It seems perverse to me that, when we have delayed discharges in hospitals and people are dying in rather unpleasant clinical conditions, people cannot be offered that appropriate setting because of those staffing issues. A lot of that is driven by inadequate pay and retention in the sector.
Does the minister accept that we really must move beyond the £12 an hour by 2026 target to get things moving in the sector and to retain that capacity? From a health economics perspective, it is a bit absurd to look at that simply in isolation, given that more than a billion pounds has been spent on delayed discharges in acute hospitals in the past decade.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
One of the big concerns that has been raised, particularly by stakeholders, trade unions and COSLA, is the balance of power between ministers and health and social care partnerships, which have traditionally been the leading bodies in social care. Will the minister revise the initial proposals on the centralisation of control and ensure that the role of health and social care partnerships or equivalent local municipal commissioning is preserved?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
You have made an important point about detail. The devil is always in the detail. People might think that ministerial control could mean the loss of managerial authority or of the ability to design local services, but it might simply mean setting national standards. That could all be set out in the bill.
In our previous evidence sessions, there were concerns about the lack of detail in the framework bill. Does the minister accept that that was a deficiency and that the pause could offer an opportunity to get into the detail of how the balance will work—for example, by looking at the structures, the lines of authority between health and social care partnerships, ministers and Parliament, and ratifying the charter for the national care service? Are those things that we could improve?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Paul Sweeney
A major point of concern was around TUPE—Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981—transfer of local government employees. Is that still something that is planned or will that be removed from the revised bill? It was clearly a sticking point.