Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 2 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1228 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

I thank the members of the panel for their contributions so far today. A key part of monitoring the appropriate implementation of assisted dying would come in the shape of the bill’s reporting provisions. Are the reporting and monitoring requirements that are set out in the bill suitably robust to pick up on any potential misapplication of the law? Do you have any views on the current provisions?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

Okay—we can certainly note the point about an independent review. The obligation is on the Scottish Government to review the legislation and report to the Parliament, so we can perhaps take a view on who would be best placed to conduct an independent review. I thank you for that feedback—it is helpful.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

That is interesting. Do other witnesses have comments on the current drafting of that section of the bill?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

That is an interesting question. Ms Cahill, do you have any points to add?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

It looks like there are no final comments on the need for amendment to improve the definitions.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

Please do, Tressa.

12:00  

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

That is great.

Lyn Pornaro, do you have any comments?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

Thank you—that is helpful.

I note that the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in England stipulates that a review should include an assessment of palliative care services, which seems to be roughly what you were suggesting, Ms Scobie. We can certainly look at that.

I know that there is a requirement in the bill for reporting within five years, but would you favour a sunset clause and/or a statutory review period that is shorter than five years following the legislation’s entry into force? Is five years too far out for you? What is your view on the timescale?

If you do not want to comment, or if there are no strong views about the five-year period, that is fine.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 January 2025

Paul Sweeney

Yes.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Scrutiny of the Scottish Housing Regulator

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Paul Sweeney

There is certainly a legal duty with regard to the ballot and the shareholder vote, which was how things played out at Reidvale. However, the root cause of the problems was the notion that it was simply good practice to carry out tenant consultation prior to a formal options appraisal. From a reading of the regulations, though, it seems to me that that is a requirement, and if the process is not compliant, there is a “Do not pass go” mechanism. In any case, the regulator should certainly intervene at that point to say, “We don’t think that you’ve followed this procedure correctly. You shouldn’t be doing an options appraisal before you’ve done consultation with the tenants and the wider stakeholders in the community.” It was only when the options appraisal was published that Reidvale was told that it needed to do a transfer of engagements. That became the narrative from that point onwards, when everyone was caught unawares. Do you see what I mean?