The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5684 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Ariane Burgess
Looking at the evidence that we have taken on damp and mould, I am concerned that we need to get beyond simply using antifungal paint for mould that appears on a wall, because the mould is still there. Can we bring in a requirement for repairs that actually get to the deeper problem and which get mould spores out of people’s homes? I have heard from not just colleagues in this room but members across the chamber that reports of damp and mould issues are appearing in their inboxes. It seems to be a very challenging situation.
In our evidence session on damp and mould, a number of local authorities told us that they are beginning to take a much more proactive approach to addressing the situation, and they are getting in there and removing whatever has been contaminated with damp and mould. How do we support that process to ensure that people have homes that are fit and proper to live in?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Ariane Burgess
Alan Johnston, just before you respond, I will tuck in a supplementary question. How does the Scottish Government’s approach differ, or not, from that of the UK Government, which was able to reach an agreement with developers?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Ariane Burgess
As I said, I have a few remaining questions. The Scottish safer buildings accord was launched almost three years ago, and yet the main element, which is the developer remediation contract, is yet to be signed by a single developer. I would be interested to understand what sticking points have prevented agreement between developers and the Scottish Government.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Ariane Burgess
That is very helpful. Thanks for flagging up the green paper consultation, which is quite interesting. To what extent does the Scottish Government engage with that kind of consultation? Are you contributing to it in some way?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Before I ask my main question, which is on penalties, I want to back to Elena Whitham’s question about the use of “theft” rather than “abduction”. The term “abduction” was used in a piece of UK legislation. Do we have a specific definition of “abduction” in Scotland that relates to people rather than pets or things? I just want clarification on that. Is that why we have gone with “dog theft” rather than “abduction”? Laura, you are nodding your head.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Can you say anything about it now? Is there a specific use of the word “abduction” that provides the reason why we have not gone with it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Not now—exactly. This is just your warm-up.
I will move on to a question about penalties. I will direct it to Laura Buchan in the first instance and then open it up to whoever wants to come in. I am interested in your views on the penalties that are included in the bill. Would you expect the provisions in the bill to have any impact on prosecution or sentencing when the new offence is used?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
I imagine that my colleague Maurice Golden considered it pretty closely in the process of developing the bill. It would be interesting to ask him those questions when he comes in front of us.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Stuart, you said that we do not have much in the way of sentencing guidelines. Are you saying that creating precedents through having such guidelines is not a door that we want to open?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Would the proposed sentencing framework allow courts to properly reflect the emotional harm that is experienced by victims instead of just the monetary value of the dog?