The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1148 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
I have heard from care-experienced young people that there are issues around claiming council tax exemptions for those who leave care between the ages of 16 and 18, even if they leave care during that period and then return. Can the minister advise whether that is the case? If it is, will the Scottish Government seek to address that disparity?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
According to research conducted by the Alcohol Health Alliance UK in 2020, more than 70 per cent of alcohol labels do not include the low-risk drinking guidelines, despite the industry reaching a voluntary agreement with the UK Government to include them. Meanwhile, the Scottish Government’s research indicates that only 17 per cent of people in Scotland are aware of the chief medical officer’s low-risk drinking guidelines.
People deserve to know what they are consuming and to be aware of the harm—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
In its response to the consultation, NSS said that reimbursement should be made only when the outcome of the mesh surgery was fully successful and requires no further treatment on the NHS. Can you expand on that? Is it fair to exclude women who might have suffered complications or had unsuccessful surgery through no fault of their own?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
Good morning, everyone. How is Covid-19 impacting the service from the point of view of staff absence or redeployment, or people’s ability to access a referral because of capacity issues in primary care? That question is probably for Dr Jamieson.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
Good morning, cabinet secretary. In the past few weeks, we have heard some of the women say that they have lost trust in the mesh services, and some of them have lost trust in the Scottish NHS as a whole. The event will have been traumatising for many of them. Earlier, you broke down one of Jackie Baillie’s questions and spoke about the bill and the position going forward. What consideration has been given to women who have already paid out of their own pockets for other wraparound care, such as mental health support? What on-going consideration is being given to women who may not feel able to undertake any form of mental health support or physiotherapy, for example, in NHS services because of their mistrust?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
When someone undergoes a drug overdose, it is vital that every effort is made to engage them in treatment and support. What is the cabinet secretary doing to ensure that all those who have been affected are being provided with effective follow-up care after they have been discharged from hospital?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
Figures published today by Public Health Scotland revealed that from April to December 2020 the number of people being diagnosed with breast, colorectal and lung cancers were, respectively, 19 per cent, 25 per cent and 9 per cent lower than would have been expected. While diagnoses of breast and lung cancer have begun to return to pre-pandemic levels, colorectal cancer diagnoses are still well below their previous levels.
It is clear that we must encourage people to come forward when they have worrying symptoms, but there is a risk that the well-publicised pressures on the health service might discourage them. What urgent action will the Scottish Government take to ensure not only that people who have symptoms seek help but that services are able to deliver a timely diagnosis when they do so?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Mackay
I welcome this debate on the stigma surrounding menopause, and I thank Collette Stevenson for bringing it to the chamber.
For too long, people going through the menopause have had their experiences and symptoms ignored and underplayed. They are often the butt of the joke and their symptoms are dismissed as women’s issues. That is why it is so important that we make time to talk about it in Parliament and raise awareness of how much impact menopause can have on women and people who menstruate.
As the motion states, much stigma still surrounds the menopause, and it is part of a wider culture that discourages people from talking about their menstrual health. That causes real harm. It prevents women from asking for support from employers or accessing healthcare. It causes shame and embarrassment, which causes unnecessary distress and can prevent people from getting the help that they need.
Workplaces can do more. A survey conducted by Engender in 2019 revealed that only 3.7 per cent of respondents were aware of their workplace having a menopause policy, and 21.7 per cent were unsure whether their workplace had one. A 2019 UK survey conducted by BUPA and the Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development found that three in five menopausal women were negatively affected at work, and almost 900,000 had left their jobs because of menopausal symptoms.
It is scandalous that so many workplaces are either unable or unwilling to make adaptations to allow for the fact that most women will go through the menopause at some point. Surely it is in their interests to make adjustments and implement policies that will allow them to retain their staff. Also, how can we hope to tackle the gender pay gap when some women are being driven out of employment by symptoms that a significant proportion of women will experience? The stigma surrounding the menopause marginalises and disadvantages women and is a driver of inequality.
How do we tackle that? As I said earlier, debates like this can help to address stigma. The Engender survey found that there has been an increase in the amount of public conversation about the menopause, its impacts, and women’s needs, although most respondents still felt that they were inadequately supported.
Conversations about the menopause should not be left to women. Everyone should be educated about menopausal symptoms. We teach children in school about puberty as part of their personal and social education, but there is no corresponding educational tool for menopause, despite it being one of the major transitions in many people’s lives.
We need robust workplace policies on health and safety, sickness absence, and flexible working, and a workplace culture that is understanding of the ways in which menopausal symptoms can impact on employees. We also need healthcare that addresses the needs of those who are experiencing menopause, and I am pleased to see that the commitments in the women’s health plan include ensuring that women receive access to specialist services for advice and support on the diagnosis and management of menopause. The availability of specialist services recognises the impact that menopause can have on people’s health and wellbeing, and that it warrants dedicated support.
Menopause stigma is born out of sexism and ageism, and we must recognise how it can intersect with other forms of discrimination. For example, we know that black women in the UK experience significant inequalities when accessing healthcare. A report published in 2019 found that black women still have more than five times the risk of dying in pregnancy or up to six weeks postpartum compared with white women. Black women might face barriers to accessing healthcare or find it difficult to have their symptoms taken seriously. I would like more research and data on how black women in Scotland are impacted by the menopause and their experiences of accessing medical and workplace support. I look forward to working with the minister and colleagues on that, and on wider women’s health issues.
17:40Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Gillian Mackay
The cabinet secretary will be aware that Loch Gairloch has suffered several times from illegal dredgers and trawlers and that, following the destruction caused by two dredgers in 2018, Parliament voted to deliver robust and tamper-proof vessel tracking on all Scottish fishing vessels. However, three years later, not all of those vessels have been fitted with any additional equipment.
The first of last week’s incidents was reported to Marine Scotland officers in the morning, but there was no officer available to visit and the protected area was breached again that very evening. There are also reports that the £2,000 fine for abusing no-take zones is inadequate and too easily dismissed as a business expense. As the current measures are not posing a sufficient deterrent, is the Scottish Government considering additional measures to prevent illegal fishing, particularly in our marine protected areas?
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
Meeting date: 28 October 2021
Gillian Mackay
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it will take to address illegal trawling. (S6O-00290)