The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 916 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Does Claire Baker welcome the recent efforts by some supermarkets to lower the price of formula to make it more affordable for families who are experiencing a tough time just now because of the cost of living crisis?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Will Claire Baker take an intervention?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 23 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
I commend Stephanie Callaghan for her work on breastfeeding. I want to mention my experience in relation to health visitors. My daughter has not had all of her health visits. The health visiting service is so understaffed that it is unable to fulfil all the milestones in a baby’s journey. Does the member find that concerning? What can we do to encourage more people to become health visitors, to ensure that we have the support in place to help mums to breastfeed?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
We have had SNAP and we are now on SNAP 2. You harnessed data back in late 2017, when about 1,500 people participated in various community events, your online surveys and of course your national participation event. Since then, we have had a pandemic and we are currently experiencing a global cost of living crisis. Is the data that you harnessed back in 2017 still relevant to the action points that you gathered? We live in an ever-changing world and I am interested in whether the action points and opinions of the Scottish people back in 2017 are still relevant.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you. The reason why I am asking that question is that SNAP 2 is described as a “living action plan”. If SNAP 2 were included in a human rights bill, how would that work in an ever-changing environment? How would that fit into the scope of legislation that might go through the Parliament?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you very much.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you. Finally, I have a question on data sets and monitoring because one of the concerns that I have had with the Scottish Government for quite some time is to do with the lack of data that records human-rights-based issues or other issues that are contained within the action points you have raised. Are you actively encouraging the Scottish Government to record more data to make sure that we can benchmark against the 54 action points that you have outlined? Certainly, MSPs would be keen to see that so that we can effectively scrutinise the work of the Scottish Government on the action points that you have highlighted within your report.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
I welcome the minister’s answer, because the suicide rate for boys and young men aged five to 24 is two times higher than that for girls and young women in the same age group. One of the recommendations in the report is that the Scottish Government sets a national equality outcome to reduce the suicide rate among five to 24-year-olds, particularly in males. Will the minister commit to implementing that?
What other recommendations from the report could be implemented to provide support to boys and young men and prevent more lives from being lost to suicide?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Meghan Gallacher
To ask the Scottish Government what work it is undertaking to reduce the rates of male suicide in Scotland, in light of the issues raised in the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s “Equality and Human Rights Monitor” report for 2023. (S6O-02950)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Meghan Gallacher
I welcome the cabinet secretary’s comments on the late arrival of her statement. When Nicola Sturgeon said last year that the debate would be over by Christmas, I do not think that she meant this Christmas. The Scottish Conservatives repeatedly told the Scottish National Party Government that the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was fundamentally flawed. We warned all along that this would happen, but the SNP Government did not listen. Instead, it has spent time and taxpayers’ money on a doomed legal battle to revive laws that the majority of the Scottish public do not want—laws that undermine the rights and safety of women, girls and vulnerable young people. Women’s groups were ignored throughout the debate, and I am delighted that their hard-fought campaign has been won. However, the debacle leaves the SNP’s relationship with the Greens in tatters. I wonder whether Green MSPs will follow through on their threat and quit the Government after the announcement. It might be a lot better for Scotland if they did.
We know that self-identification has been a failed experiment that the Scottish public oppose. Will the cabinet secretary outline whether lessons have been learned? If so, can she reassure women’s groups that their concerns will be listened to in the future to prevent this sorry saga from ever happening again?