Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 2 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 420 contributions

|

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 8 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Will the minister outline the justification for amending the legislation? Where does the five-year limit originate from?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 8 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Would the introduction of the regulations make it easier for people between the ages of 18 and 25 who are identified as having harmed children being allowed to work with vulnerable groups sooner? Is there a risk in making the process more accessible?

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 8 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

How do you think the victims who have had such crimes committed against them would feel if someone could go through the system, be approved and be able to work with vulnerable groups sooner? There is a risk that the legislation could favour the perpetrator over the victim, in this instance.

09:45  

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 8 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

I do not have much to add to the debate, but I will touch on one or two points that colleagues made.

I reiterate the point that I am absolutely not scaremongering. The concerns are legitimate. We need to weigh up risks and I am not convinced that the regulations would eliminate the risks that we have spoken about.

Stephanie Callaghan mentioned an assertion that it was all about serious offences. That is not what I said and I think that she has picked me up wrongly. I said that there was a wide-ranging list of offences. That is where another concern comes in. It could be something minimal or it could be something more serious. It is a matter of weighing up what would be approved and what would not be approved. We need to have more discussions about that instead of approving the legislation as is.

I want to touch on the barred list. I understand James Dornan’s point. However, as we heard earlier, 13 out of the 19 applications were successful. That shows that there is a sway in respect of applications being approved. That is okay if they have gone through robust processes, but it adds a further element of risk.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

I refer members to my entry in the register of members’ interests: I am a serving councillor in North Lanarkshire.

My question relates to the one about tourism that the convener asked. I have heard concerns that the proposed licensing scheme could have a damaging impact as businesses try to recover from the pandemic. Many businesses rely on tourism at home and the tourism industry to give them a boost. What are the panel’s concerns about the timing of the legislation? What lasting impacts might it have on businesses across the sector?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Retrofitting Housing for Net Zero

Meeting date: 30 November 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Before I ask my question, I refer everyone to my entry in the register of members’ interests, which states that I am a serving councillor on North Lanarkshire Council.

My question is about the relationship between retrofitting and protecting the distinctive characteristics of individual places. How do we protect the character of a community?

My second question is similar to one that Willie Coffey asked earlier. How do we involve communities to ensure that their views are represented in that regard and that there is an element of protection for them? I would like Aaron Hill to answer those questions first.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Retrofitting Housing for Net Zero

Meeting date: 30 November 2021

Meghan Gallacher

The question is about the relationship between retrofitting and protecting the distinctive characters of individual places. How can we protect the character of our communities? How can we get members of the public and those communities involved so that their views are heard and the communities that they love are protected?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Retrofitting Housing for Net Zero

Meeting date: 30 November 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Good morning. You might have heard from my questions to the previous witnesses that I am quite interested in the relationship between retrofitting and protecting the distinctive characters of individual places. How do we protect the character of a community while we retrofit properties, and how do we involve those communities in the planning for retrofitting?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Retrofitting Housing for Net Zero

Meeting date: 30 November 2021

Meghan Gallacher

It would be good to hear from Derek Logie about the rural perspective, given the make-up of rural communities.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Retrofitting Housing for Net Zero

Meeting date: 30 November 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Thank you.