The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 597 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
How did the Government arrive at the conclusions that it arrived at on the regulations? Why did you not consult rural businesses on the impact of this Scottish statutory instrument?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
You have said that you have not consulted the rural sector, but hundreds of small rural businesses have warned that losing the small business bonus scheme relief will increase their fixed costs to the extent that they are considering making redundancies. The regulations will also have other impacts, including loss of revenue and productivity, and they could act as a deterrent to future investment in the rural sector. What is your response to the businesses that are going to lose out on the scheme?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
On that point specifically, you will be aware that a broad range of activities take place on shootings and in deer forests. In many cases, they do not include sports—that does not feature in the activities that take place. How do you reconcile that with what has been proposed and what I understand to be the policy intention? Those are the businesses that will not qualify for the scheme.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Finally, shootings and deer forests cannot be separated from the land that they refer to. Can the minister clarify what is meant by regulations 3(5)(d)(i) and 4(5)(d)(i), which refer to
“shootings which are crofts, agricultural landholdings or small landholdings”?
Do you share the view of others that further clarification of definitions and what is required needs to be fully looked into?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I am sure that small businesses will welcome that opportunity, because I believe that there will be unintended consequences.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I wish to speak about the Non-Domestic Rates (Levying and Miscellaneous Amendment) (Scotland) Regulations 2026.
I refer members to the letter that was sent to the convener on 18 February by Scottish Land & Estates. The letter asks the committee to
“suspend voting on an upcoming SSI on the withdrawal of the Small Business Bonus Scheme … relief from most sporting rates liabilities, as announced in the Scottish Budget for 2026–27.”
Scottish Land & Estates further sets out that
“Our primary concern is not with the policy, but with how it has been developed”,
and that it does not feel that there has been sufficient
“consultation with the rural sector on the withdrawal of SBBS relief for sporting rates.”
There are also concerns about the impact that the proposal could have on the rural sector, with a potential impact on food production, deer management capacity, tax liability without sporting activities, and environmental land management, while biodiversity-positive practices could be put under pressure.
09:30
I believe that, in the light of the evidence that SLE has raised with the committee and other policies that have been introduced elsewhere, such as the family farm tax, the introduction of the SSI could have unintended consequences. We do not want any more policies that could harm the sector. Scottish Land & Estates has been clear that it wishes evidence to be taken on the SSI, which I think is wise, given the complexity of the issue. I seek the committee’s permission to invite the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity to the committee so that we can take evidence on the issue and ensure that the instrument will have no unintended consequences for our rural sector.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning. We have already touched on the premiums, so I will not go back to questions on those. However, the committee heard last week about a number of circumstances that may arise in rural areas where properties might need to be left empty for periods of time. One example that was given was operational rural accommodation linked to estate operations. I am looking for more information from the cabinet secretary on whether the Scottish Government will provide guidance for local authorities to help to ensure consistency in how those properties are treated.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Meghan Gallacher
:I am still a little bit concerned, because I believe that there is a risk that local authorities are, in effect, incentivised to not exempt such properties because of the additional income that they might get from generating those types of policies. How does the cabinet secretary propose to mitigate that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Meghan Gallacher
:That is helpful. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Meghan Gallacher
:Good morning. Cabinet secretary, you touched on the fact that the exemption will apply to buildings of more than six units. How did the Scottish Government take account of the differences between urban and rural settings when arriving at that definition?