The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2372 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
Your letter to the convener talks about the SPS agreement, if I may swivel to that issue. You rightly suggest in the second paragraph that
“Progress on an SPS agreement, if realised”—
if realised—
“can bring real benefits”.
You were very positive earlier about the prospect of that being realised, but that might well be your natural, buoyant optimism speaking. The reality is that negotiations with the European Union are pretty difficult and sometimes very extended. From what you understand, when could we see such an agreement? There is no such agreement at the minute. It is all just vague good feelings. When could there realistically be an agreement?
From our conversations in London, it looks like the first year—that is, between the previous summit in May and the next one—is all going to be about security action for Europe, or SAFE. It will all be about defence and security. EU negotiating positions, notoriously, take a while—you know that better than most. The idea that they will be done by the end of the summer also seems optimistic, so when could we realistically be looking at scrutinising a proposed SPS agreement between the UK and the EU?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
So, it could be years off.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
For the SPS?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
I think that the sense on the continent is of an imminent threat of war. Therefore, it is understandable that the European Union will want to press ahead—and rightly so—with British inclusion in SAFE as a third country. I am sure that we could have a longer session on that, but I do not think that there is an appetite to have it today.
On proper EU SPS agreements, there are two models in existence. The agreement with Switzerland, which has been in place since 1999, has dynamic alignment. The EU’s SPS agreement with New Zealand, which uses a different model, is even older. It recognises the equivalence of sanitary measures, minimises physical checks and allows streamlined certification—the last of which would be highly desirable for us as well, I hope you would agree. Of those two existing models—I know that an argument will be that there is a third model, because Britain is in a different category, but those are the two existing off-the-shelf models—I think that what you say in your letter to the convener is that you would favour “dynamic alignment”.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Stephen Kerr
Can I have one final, very quick question?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
George Adam is not a fan of regulators in general, I think, and I am afraid that I join him in that. The Westminster Parliament gives regulators powers, but I am unconvinced that they use their powers. I think that George Adam has made a very strong case for that in connection with what is happening with radio broadcasting in Scotland. At the end of the day, the reason why we have a regulator is to make sure that the marketplace is fair and that it fairly reflects what Parliament—Westminster in this case—has regulated for you to enforce.
I did not think that the answer that you gave to Alexander Stewart was particularly convincing. Instead of talking about ensuring that the 8 per cent of programming that the BBC is required to make in Scotland is made in Scotland by local production, it sounded like you were creating a massive loophole by talking about nuance and flexibility. How committed is the regulator, Ofcom, to insisting that that 8 per cent is not just a tick box for the BBC and that the programme is actually being made by locally based production companies? I did not hear any assurance in response to Mr Stewart’s question that that was your intention at all.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
No, I understand that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
What is Ofcom’s interpretation of that wording currently? You are the regulator, and I presume you have interpreted article 14. What is your interpretation?
09:15Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
No, what does
“authentic portrayal and representation of the diverse communities”
mean? What programming, what tangible measurement? I know that you are reporting—I get that—but what is your tangible measurement? How do we know whether the BBC is fulfilling article 14 in a Scottish context?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Are they happy with it?