The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2256 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
With regard to the petitioner’s expectations, it is only fair to say that we are not going to get to this specific aspect of education policy any time soon—not within a year, at least—because of the inquiries that we already have under way. You mentioned the Ken Muir report. On top of that, we have a growing number of legislative requirements, which will also take up our time.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
As there are no other comments, do members agree to write to the cabinet secretary, asking for an update on the anticipated timescale for the guidance that is being developed by the working group?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
I am not sure that politicians should be getting involved in that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
The next petition is PE1692, which is on an inquiry into the human rights impact of the getting it right for every child—GIRFEC—policy and data processing. I am not a great fan of all these acronyms; I have to keep reminding myself of what they stand for. The petition, which was lodged by Lesley Scott and Alison Preuss on behalf of Tymes Trust and the Scottish Home Education Forum, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to initiate an independent public inquiry into the impact on human rights of the routine gathering and sharing of citizens’ personal information on which its GIRFEC policy relies.
Our papers say that, in January 2020, the Deputy First Minister and then Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills explained that his officials were in the early stages of developing a package of products based on shared principles around how services should handle sensitive personal information, to ensure that children, young people and their parents could be assured that their rights were being respected. At that time, the Deputy First Minister expected to publish those materials at the end of 2020; however, progress was delayed by the pandemic. In February 2021, responding to a request for an update, the Deputy First Minister indicated that the guidance would be finalised later in 2021. As yet, that guidance has not been published.
I ask members for their comments. Although I am not a fan of acronyms, the subject matter of personal data is a critical issue in the minds of many people, including the petitioners.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
The final petition is PE1747, which was lodged by Alison Thomson. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to provide adequate funding to support children with additional support needs in all Scottish schools—primary, secondary and special.
Our papers outline the action that was taken on the petition by the session 5 Public Petitions Committee and its decision to refer the petition to the Education and Skills Committee. In its legacy report, the session 5 education committee explained that it undertook work on additional support for learning following the referral of PE1747, which included, at its 18 November 2020 meeting, taking evidence from Angela Morgan on her additional support for learning review report and, as part of its pre-budget scrutiny, looking at additional support needs. However, the committee stated that, given the time constraints, it was unable to fully consider the petition. Do members have any comments on the petition?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
That is a very good point, which highlights the concerns of the petitioner. That is, of course, why we are having this discussion.
Are we agreed to keep the petition open and to consider the matter further in a future discussion of our work programme?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Do the additional teachers have permanent contracts now?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Could it have happened in South Lanarkshire?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
As an example.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
We had a bit of a technical hitch there, Willie. Were you talking about the number of teachers on temporary contracts?