The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2256 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
That is a very clear position. To an extent, the issue is a silver thread that runs through so many other issues that we consider as part of our work programme, so it is not completely out there. As you pointed out, it keeps coming back up in the committee’s work.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Willie Rennie is right. It has dawned on a lot of us in the committee that headteachers’ leadership calibre is the critical factor in the performance of a range of indicators. We heard some amazing stories when we were interacting with teachers and parents. The committee would be interested in learning more about the leadership development programmes that are being used and successfully deployed, and the effect of those programmes. That is a subject that we would want to come back to.
Michael Marra has a supplementary question.
10:30Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
I will give you a break for a minute. Willie Rennie wants to come in with a supplementary question. I will make way for him and then bring in Mark Ratter, which will give Mark a bit longer to prepare his answer.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
What proportion of the workforce in your local authority area is on temporary contracts?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Is the money additional in the sense that it is not being used to plug any gaps that have arisen from core funding shifting or being cut?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
When you say “manage the staffing out”, does that mean that people will lose their jobs?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Are people going to lose their jobs?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
You surprise me a little bit. It is almost as though you are saying that you welcome the refresh.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
So, strictly speaking, it is not additionality, is it?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Welcome back. The next item on our agenda is consideration of public petitions. We will first consider PE1548, which is about national guidance on restraint and seclusion in schools. It was lodged by Beth Morrison.
The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce national guidance on the use of restraint and seclusion in all schools. The petition says that the guidance should support the principles of last resort so that, when it is deemed necessary, restraint should be the minimum required to deal with the agreed risk, for the minimum amount of time, and with appropriate supervision of the child at all times, including during “time out” or seclusion.
The guidance should also support the principles of reducing the use of solitary exclusion and limiting the time that it is used for—for example, by setting a maximum time limit; not using restraints that are cruel, humiliating, painful and unnecessary or that are not in line with trained techniques; and the accountability of teaching and support staff for their actions, which should include recording every incident leading to the use of seclusion or restraint and monitoring of that by the local authority.
The guidance should also include the principles that there will be regular training for staff in how to avoid the use of restraint and that, when restraint is unavoidable, there will be training in the use of appropriate restraint techniques from providers accredited by the British Institute of Learning Disabilities, with no use of restraint by untrained staff.
The petition also calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to appoint a specific agency—either Education Scotland or, possibly, the Care Inspectorate—to monitor the support and care that is given in non-educational areas, including by evaluating the restraint and seclusion of children with special needs in local authority, voluntary sector or private special schools.
Our papers outline the work that was undertaken on the petition by the Public Petitions Committee and the session 5 Education and Skills Committee. In December 2019, the Deputy First Minister and then Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills confirmed that
“the Scottish Government will produce new national guidance that will provide a clear human rights-based policy on physical intervention and seclusion in Scottish schools”.—[Official Report, Public Petitions Committee, 19 December 2019; c 22.]
A working group, whose membership included the petitioner, was established in early 2020 to develop and agree the new guidance. Although progress was delayed by the pandemic, the Deputy First Minister indicated, in correspondence dated 16 February 2021, that the guidance would be finalised later in 2021. As yet, that guidance has not been published.
Do members have any comments on the petition?