The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1502 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
NPF4 could be the key to making Scotland’s places more sustainable, liveable and productive, and it is, indeed, heartwarming to see progress on the effective delivery of the new policies. As councils begin to review their local development plans to align with NPF4, can the minister outline how the new planning system will accelerate Scotland’s wellbeing economy?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the implementation of the fourth national planning framework since its adoption on 13 February 2023. (S6O-01974)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
What discussions have taken place with developers, whose responsibility it is to ensure that their buildings are compliant with fire safety regulations? Can the cabinet secretary offer any reassurances to people who live in the properties that are affected, including those in my Glasgow Kelvin constituency, who are, understandably, concerned and frustrated?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on its progress on cladding remediation. (S6O-01956)
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
You will be aware that, at last week’s meeting, the Minister for Children and Young People said that ministers had discussions with you about the modelling in the financial memorandum and that you were looking to work with stakeholders to better understand the potential costs of the bill. You have said that you have not yet met with COSLA. Can you update us on which stakeholders you have engaged with or intend to engage with?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you for the clarification, convener.
The approximate cost in your financial memorandum is £893,372 in year 1, but the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities estimate is 11 times that, so can I get a wee bit of an understanding of how you originally came across your figures?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
According to the Finance and Public Administration Committee, all the evidence that it received considered that the financial memorandum
“understates the cost of implementing changes”.
What, then, was your rationale for expecting that some costs would be accommodated within existing resources?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Okay, but can I get an understanding of how you came across your figures—how those were informed?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you, convener. We will look at the financial memorandum. Bill Scott, I think that you have already alluded to the fact that you might have got the figures wrong—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Kaukab Stewart
We have talked a little bit about the definitions of disability that would be included under the Equality Act 2010, and, in other sessions, we have heard evidence about the time allocated for preparation being underestimated simply because of the complexity of arranging and delivering multi-agency meetings. On reflection, do you feel that your figures are underestimates?