The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1502 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I bring in Paul O’Kane.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Yes, as is the usual experience.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
That is interesting. Earlier this morning, the committee heard about the situation in which a citizen might want to sue the Government. However, what about the consumer—the person on the street—who might want to sue their lawyer because they have not received a good service? What I have heard, albeit anecdotally—but also through constituency work, because people know that the committee is dealing with this so they come to talk to me—is that some people have not had good experiences. They feel that they are up against a whole system and that that system looks after itself. Did you speak to individuals or look at such casework? Can you give us an example of that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you for that. The diagrams were exceptionally helpful and I say that not just as a teacher who loves diagrams. [Laughter.] They do illustrate things.
I will ask for clarification on a few points. The diagram of the current regulatory framework says that the
“Scottish ministers have duty to consult Lord President”.
What does that involve? Is that a legal duty to consult and if so, on what, for example? How do you know that ministers have consulted? Does that transfer into decisions? I am interested in what power ministers have at the moment.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you very much. I will kick off the questions; my colleagues will then come in.
Lady Dorrian, you mentioned the role of the Lord President. I want to give you an opportunity to unpick that a little bit. Can you give us some practical examples of the role of the Lord President and the implications of the bill for what the Lord President would or would not be able to do?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
The minister has indicated that amendments will be lodged that should allay some of the concerns that have been robustly raised, but we do not know what those amendments will be. In that wriggle room, would either of you like to give me an indication of what those amendments could be that would address your concerns?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Fair enough.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I have been listening really carefully and would like to come back on a few points. I would like to generate more discussion about the consumer’s perspective, because we have taken lots of evidence on the lawyer’s point of view and every other view. Can you give us some insight into how the consumer’s point of view informed your report, whether your views have developed on that and whether the consumer is served well by the bill in its current state?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I have a final question before I bring Karen Adam in on that theme. I am interested in how the Lord President takes the views of consumers into account when he is carrying out his regulatory functions. For example, are there any formal processes to ensure that consumer views are considered in addition to the views of the legal profession?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Good morning, and welcome to the 25th meeting in 2023 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have no apologies this morning.
Our first agenda item is our fifth evidence session on the Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill. We have two panels of witnesses this morning. We are privileged to welcome senators of the College of Justice for our first panel. The Rt Hon Lady Dorrian is the Lord Justice Clerk, who is the second most senior judge in Scotland. She was appointed as a temporary judge in 2002, and she became a judge in the supreme courts in 2005. She was appointed Lord Justice Clerk in 2016. She sits in the inner house of the Court of Session, and she is the president of the second division of the inner house.
The honourable Lord Ericht was appointed as a judge of the supreme courts in 2016. He sits in the outer house of the Court of Session and also presides over trials in the High Court of Justiciary. He is also a chair of the United Kingdom Competition Appeal Tribunal.
We are grateful to both of you for giving up your time to speak to us today.
We are aware of the concerns that have been expressed by the senior judiciary with regard to the bill in response to our call for views and in correspondence with the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. We will seek to explore those concerns in depth this morning.
We have also noted the DPLR Committee’s report, which was published last Thursday, and we have written to the Minister for Victims and Community Safety to seek more detail from her on what impact any potential changes to the bill might have and whether they would alleviate and address the concerns that have been expressed.
We expect Oliver Mundell from the DPLR Committee to attend today’s meeting as soon as his committee has concluded its business.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2, and I invite Lady Dorrian to provide an opening statement on behalf of the senators of the College of Justice.