The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1524 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament Business until 14:51
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Elena Whitham
It is important to recognise the unwavering support and dedication of families with neurodivergent children. I am part of such a family and can attest to the extreme challenges that they face in seeking to secure access to diagnosis and support.
Can the minister please provide an update on what further actions the Scottish Government is taking, both in the 2025-26 budget and in the longer term, to best support families of neurodivergent young people in alleviating the difficulties that they face?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Elena Whitham
I share the concerns expressed in the member’s question.
Will the minister explain how the cumulative impact of trade deals that deliver nothing to the primary producer, together with the uncertainty about future levels of funding and the potential threats to Scotland’s future support schemes posed by the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 1998 and the Subsidy Control Act 2022—all of which was presided over by Douglas Ross’s party and which he supported—have exacerbated the very issues that Douglas Ross brings to the chamber today?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Elena Whitham
It is important to recognise the unwavering support and dedication of families with neurodivergent children. I am part of such a family and can attest to the extreme challenges that you face in seeking to secure access to diagnosis and support.
Can the minister please provide an update on what further intended actions the Scottish Government is taking, both in the 2025-26 budget and in the longer term, to best support families of neurodivergent young people in alleviating the difficulties that they face?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
I would like to explore some of the articles in the European Convention on Human Rights. I have a question on article 8, which covers the right to decide how and when to die, and article 2, which you already referenced and which requires that there be suitable protections in place for vulnerable groups in any assisted dying process.
I take it that you do not think that the bill gets the balance right between those two provisions, but could you expand a little on that? You have also mentioned the provisions on conscientious objection. Does the bill get those provisions right? If the bill is to be enacted, what could be changed that would strengthen it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
I would like to explore the concept of the slippery slope, which is often spoken about. Indeed, Care Not Killing’s written submission states that
“any limit other than prohibition is arbitrary and ripe for challenge.”
I will ground my initial question in Scotland—I am thinking about our institutions and the way in which the bill could be enacted. Do the witnesses agree that any future expansion of the eligibility criteria for assisted dying would have to be subject to the scrutiny of the Parliament? We can perhaps start with Gordon Macdonald, as I referenced your written submission.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Do the witnesses have any views on whether any amendments could be made to prevent a broadening of the law once it was in place to prevent such challenges?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
My final question is about the assertion that the bill normalises assisted dying and that numbers could increase on the back of that. From the recent figures from Canada, we can all see that increasing numbers of citizens are using their right to an assisted death. How would you come back on the assertion that that expansion of uptake is evidence of a slippery slope as well?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Do other witnesses want to come in on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Does any of the witnesses have any argument as to why there is a difference in the way that the law was enacted in Canada and the challenges that arose there versus, as Aly Thomson set out, the different legislative landscape in Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Caveating everything that you have put into that answer, I took from it that the matter would have to come back in front of the Parliament should there be any changes—unless those changes came from a challenge to a court having made a decision on that basis.