Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1524 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament Business until 14:51

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Elena Whitham

It is important to recognise the unwavering support and dedication of families with neurodivergent children. I am part of such a family and can attest to the extreme challenges that they face in seeking to secure access to diagnosis and support.

Can the minister please provide an update on what further actions the Scottish Government is taking, both in the 2025-26 budget and in the longer term, to best support families of neurodivergent young people in alleviating the difficulties that they face?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Elena Whitham

I share the concerns expressed in the member’s question.

Will the minister explain how the cumulative impact of trade deals that deliver nothing to the primary producer, together with the uncertainty about future levels of funding and the potential threats to Scotland’s future support schemes posed by the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 1998 and the Subsidy Control Act 2022—all of which was presided over by Douglas Ross’s party and which he supported—have exacerbated the very issues that Douglas Ross brings to the chamber today?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 22 January 2025

Elena Whitham

It is important to recognise the unwavering support and dedication of families with neurodivergent children. I am part of such a family and can attest to the extreme challenges that you face in seeking to secure access to diagnosis and support.

Can the minister please provide an update on what further intended actions the Scottish Government is taking, both in the 2025-26 budget and in the longer term, to best support families of neurodivergent young people in alleviating the difficulties that they face?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Elena Whitham

I would like to explore some of the articles in the European Convention on Human Rights. I have a question on article 8, which covers the right to decide how and when to die, and article 2, which you already referenced and which requires that there be suitable protections in place for vulnerable groups in any assisted dying process.

I take it that you do not think that the bill gets the balance right between those two provisions, but could you expand a little on that? You have also mentioned the provisions on conscientious objection. Does the bill get those provisions right? If the bill is to be enacted, what could be changed that would strengthen it?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Elena Whitham

I would like to explore the concept of the slippery slope, which is often spoken about. Indeed, Care Not Killing’s written submission states that

“any limit other than prohibition is arbitrary and ripe for challenge.”

I will ground my initial question in Scotland—I am thinking about our institutions and the way in which the bill could be enacted. Do the witnesses agree that any future expansion of the eligibility criteria for assisted dying would have to be subject to the scrutiny of the Parliament? We can perhaps start with Gordon Macdonald, as I referenced your written submission.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Elena Whitham

Do the witnesses have any views on whether any amendments could be made to prevent a broadening of the law once it was in place to prevent such challenges?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Elena Whitham

My final question is about the assertion that the bill normalises assisted dying and that numbers could increase on the back of that. From the recent figures from Canada, we can all see that increasing numbers of citizens are using their right to an assisted death. How would you come back on the assertion that that expansion of uptake is evidence of a slippery slope as well?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Elena Whitham

Do other witnesses want to come in on that?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Elena Whitham

Does any of the witnesses have any argument as to why there is a difference in the way that the law was enacted in Canada and the challenges that arose there versus, as Aly Thomson set out, the different legislative landscape in Scotland?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 January 2025

Elena Whitham

Caveating everything that you have put into that answer, I took from it that the matter would have to come back in front of the Parliament should there be any changes—unless those changes came from a challenge to a court having made a decision on that basis.