The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1672 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
How will you ensure that lasting organisational change comes about, and not just localised pockets of improvement? Which other organisations will you work with? We need to think outside the silos, so how will you drive lasting change?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Beyond the extension of voting rights, would any other changes address the current power dynamics on IJBs?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
I am thinking about the issue in the context of the expansion of participatory budgeting and governance. That was about everybody coming together and having a stake, with power-sharing of difficult decisions. The argument that was put forward at the time by local government, in conjunction with communities, was that that would strengthen decision making and strengthen democracy. I am trying to square that with the path that you are treading now, which is maybe not looking to extend the democratic ability of those who are on IJBs to have influence on decisions via a vote rather than just soft power.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Does that demonstrate that governance reform is the only thing that would lead to true public service reform?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Good morning, commissioner. We have touched quite a lot on the issue of the cultural change that is required. It lies at the heart of why we are in the situation that we are in.
The committee’s stage 1 report on the Patient Safety Commissioner for Scotland Bill, which created the office of Patient Safety Commissioner, highlighted that, rather than being a result of gaps in policy, the systemic failures that we have seen have arisen because of deep-seated cultural and behavioural patterns in the healthcare system. You have already mentioned some of those, such as not listening to what patients say, the lack of accountability and the closing of ranks. Is the very hierarchical structure of our health boards a factor when it comes to tackling cultural barriers to change?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Supporters of the proposal to extend the voting rights, including you, minister, talk about the proposal being inclusive and helping to embed participatory governance. Could you share with us what outcomes you expect from the move? Do you think that it will bring about earlier co-design? Is it expected to ensure that there are prevention-focused decisions? What are the outcomes that the Scottish Government wants to see?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Good morning. I want to spend a bit of time exploring how lived-experience influence could be supported and amplified, especially now that we are in an age of participatory governance reform. Given the difficult decisions that locally elected councillors are taking, we have made moves to try to mainstream participatory budgeting, to power share in that difficult decision making and to give parity of esteem. If voting is not the preferred route for COSLA, what alternative would most effectively strengthen lived-experience influence?
That influence exists at the moment, as has been outlined. However, although votes might not be taken very often, when they are taken, it is a critical marker of parity of esteem if certain individuals can vote and some cannot. I want to explore parity of esteem and how we can increase influence if we do not extend voting rights.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
But how are you going to measure and monitor that cultural change? As we know, and as you have said this morning, the lack of data is a big difficulty. How will you and your office monitor that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Elena Whitham
One of my big worries is about ensuring that the victim/survivor is in the driving seat as much as possible. I worked previously with social landlords in this policy area, and I would caution against their taking the driver’s seat—they must ensure that what is done is done in conjunction with the victim/survivor, as opposed to something being done to them, if that makes sense.