The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1390 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
I would like to explore the concept of the slippery slope, which is often spoken about. Indeed, Care Not Killing’s written submission states that
“any limit other than prohibition is arbitrary and ripe for challenge.”
I will ground my initial question in Scotland—I am thinking about our institutions and the way in which the bill could be enacted. Do the witnesses agree that any future expansion of the eligibility criteria for assisted dying would have to be subject to the scrutiny of the Parliament? We can perhaps start with Gordon Macdonald, as I referenced your written submission.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Do the witnesses have any views on whether any amendments could be made to prevent a broadening of the law once it was in place to prevent such challenges?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
My final question is about the assertion that the bill normalises assisted dying and that numbers could increase on the back of that. From the recent figures from Canada, we can all see that increasing numbers of citizens are using their right to an assisted death. How would you come back on the assertion that that expansion of uptake is evidence of a slippery slope as well?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Do other witnesses want to come in on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Does any of the witnesses have any argument as to why there is a difference in the way that the law was enacted in Canada and the challenges that arose there versus, as Aly Thomson set out, the different legislative landscape in Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Caveating everything that you have put into that answer, I took from it that the matter would have to come back in front of the Parliament should there be any changes—unless those changes came from a challenge to a court having made a decision on that basis.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
When any legislation is enacted, there will always be a period of review—as you rightly pointed out, one is built into the bill—to consider what can change as practice develops over time.
Would anybody else like to put across their thoughts about the slippery slope argument? I will hand back to the convener after that, because I am conscious of time.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Thank you very much.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning, panel members. First, I remind the committee of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which notes that I am a member of the Humanist Society of Scotland.
A common argument against assisted dying is that it would be the start of a slippery slope, either to an increasing number of people having an assisted death, or to more permissive laws, with expanded eligibility and fewer safeguards. I would like to explore the slippery slope argument with the witnesses. How do you respond to assertions that human rights challenges to the bill are likely and will inevitably lead to an expansion of the legislation?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Elena Whitham
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the progress being made to improve the learning outcomes of pupils to prepare them for careers in the technology sector. (S6O-04175)