The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1672 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
While some drank and danced in Downing Street, young people across Scotland were some of the most affected throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. Like many others, my own daughter saw her transition from primary school to secondary school disrupted, with long-term impacts still being felt. Will the Deputy First Minister speak to the importance of the views of young people throughout the inquiry and advise how the Scottish Government will use their experiences to inform its response to the module 2 report and its findings, and how we will prepare for such a threat again?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the work it has been doing regarding people obtaining in-person GP appointments. (S6O-05175)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
In my constituency, access to general practice remains a concern, particularly in rural communities. The position varies between practices, but constituents contact me regularly about the matter. Does the cabinet secretary agree that investment must be matched by concerted targeted support for recruitment and retention to ensure sustainable care in all parts of Scotland, including Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
I want to explore that a bit further. Have you had any conversations with National Records of Scotland or Public Health Scotland about their interpretation of the data that is collected on a death certificate? I am thinking about Brian Whittle’s point. For example, if there were a cluster of a certain type of cancer in an area, would the information that would pertain follow through, in terms of its being recorded as the primary or secondary cause of death on the death certificate? Have you had any interaction with those bodies to understand how that information is used?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
I have a query further to the point that Mr Whittle raised in relation to malicious intervention. If amendment 189 was agreed to, how do you foresee that a case in which someone asked for a review would proceed? That process could open up information about the deceased person’s medical history that they might not have wanted the individual who requested a review to know. They might not have had a loving relationship with that individual. What safeguarding would be put in that would respect the deceased person’s wishes?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Will the member give way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
I thank Pam Duncan-Glancy for putting that on the record. The difference, though, is that we do not have a track 2 proposed in the bill before us, and Liam McArthur’s amendments ensure that there will be no consideration of somebody as being terminally ill by dint of their having a disability or a mental health condition. Therefore, I am pretty convinced that we are not going along the same lines as what exists in Canada, and I do not think that the UN committee would see that, either.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Elena Whitham
If we take the 32 local authorities as an example of the public bodies, how can we ensure that wellbeing and sustainable development are threaded into the local outcomes improvement plans that they put in place? Those plans are reportable to the community planning partnerships, which ensure that all the bodies in the local area are pulling in the same direction.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning. Keeping on the topic of the national performance framework, can you give us any further information about the review that you mentioned is under way, specifically in relation to how sustainable development and wellbeing requirements will be bolstered to help to deliver the societal change that is needed? Although the 2015 act and the NPF have been in place for a long time, we are still not seeing that being pulled through as a thread into actual outcomes. How will that be bolstered with the review?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Elena Whitham
We have heard a few times from folk who have given evidence to the committee that the existing duties on public bodies through the NPF and related legislation are too weak. How would you respond to that, specifically in relation to the area of wellbeing and sustainable development?