The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 846 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
So, it is about continuing the co-design, if you like, through the process so that it keeps impacting on delivery and policy.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
Will you give us a couple of examples of the type of detail that you would like to see?
10:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
I will wind back a bit. How do we ensure that people who are receiving support are kept central to the evaluations that we are talking about? Would the national performance framework be helpful, and would it be part of that in your view?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
My first question is to Henry Simmons and Dr Manji. Are there parts of the bill that you would like to be enacted immediately and are there other provisions about which you think that more time should be taken to co-design them?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
I was panicking there, convener, because I have two questions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
Keeping in mind what Clare Gallagher has said, we are now going to talk about an integrated and accessible electronic social care and health record. The fact that that is a bit of a mouthful might in itself be something that we need to think about. I am also very aware of the complexities around access to such a record and its location and ownership.
My first question is for Karen Sheridan. What are the main benefits of having an electronic social care and health record? I am also interested in how we would make it accessible for people with learning disabilities or literacy issues and people whose first language is not English. Clare Gallagher might want to comment on that as well.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
I think that the whole point of having an integrated and accessible record is that all the information is in the one place, but I appreciate that point.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
That leads me on to my next question, which is for Hannah Tweed. Should social care users have ownership of and access to a single integrated electronic care record? If they should, how could that work effectively on the ground in practical terms?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
I would like to pick up on that. When we visited Granite Care Consortium, the providers themselves were stepping care up and down without having to reference back, which I think Rachel Cackett mentioned earlier, and we saw how important that had been. In the final report, there was also evidence of a reduced number of hospital admissions during the Covid pandemic.
I appreciate that there are criticisms and concerns about moving to a national care service but, assuming that it will happen, are there positives that we can take from what you are doing in Aberdeen? Many such approaches could be implemented in the current system but are not, which seems to be where the real problem is. What are the biggest lessons that we can take away from what is currently happening in Aberdeen, as regards a national care service coming into effect and ensuring that other areas are picking up on those strengths?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2022
Stephanie Callaghan
My question is a follow-up to Emma Harper’s. Nick Price, what difference has having a co-ordinating role—as opposed to competing with each other—made to providers and to those who receive care from you?