The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
No, we would keep it as a control scheme at that stage, because people can say anything that they like. The proof of the pudding is in the eating, when they actually come in and start carrying out the measures that are required.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
If NatureScot were to de-escalate a control scheme and the new owner said that they would carry that out and then did not comply, NatureScot would be back to square 1. It would land back on the minister’s desk to be signed off, and so on. If the order stays with the land, the process is there. It is not about the individual; it is about the landscape-scale management of the deer in the area. If a control scheme stays in place, it is actually an incentive for the people who are selling their land to make sure that they have deer management in place. You generally do not sell an estate at the drop of a hat. If that is one of the preparations that a person has to do to make sure that there is no deer order on their estate, that would be a good thing from their point of view.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
It would be far beyond my remit to give advice on how people should sell their land. I will leave that thought with you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
We will have a look at that. Ross Ewing raised that in a previous evidence session, in relation to situations where you can see or hear somebody. Let us consider what that means, and we will flesh that out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Stalkers do not need any training at the moment—that answers the argument, as it shows that we really should be doing something. As I said in my previous answer, we will bring in the measures at stage 2, and we will consider the best way to manage those who have been stalking for 30 or 40 years and who are more than competent but who do not have a certificate that says so. We will then consider how to manage the transition, ensuring that everybody gets up to that fit and competent standard.
I absolutely take on board the point that you are making. Right now, stalkers do not need anything at all; they need only a gun licence.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
All that people will have to do is report it. It is not the case that someone will have committed an offence for shooting a stray deer. If someone shoots a deer and it turns out to be a farmed deer, all they will have to do is report it within five days—that is all that is required.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I think that QMS has more than enough on its plate in dealing with the products that it already deals with. Venison is a fairly unique product and should be marketed as such, and there is a lot that we can do that does not have to be done under the umbrella of QMS. It is also not something that we would need to legislate on. It is fine the way it is.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
We might have to look into some technical issues with that, but I hear your point.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I would not say that the system has not worked at the moment—it is just that deer numbers are where they are, and we are now going to take action to try to get those numbers down.
There is a huge amount of good will in the sector. I have had a number of meetings with land managers and deer managers, and everybody is agreed that we want to do this and get the numbers down. There are varying reasons as to why the numbers may have gone up, but there is a concerted effort to get them down. Everybody is actually on board with that—that is one of the things that I have taken from my engagement with stakeholders on the bill. They may be unhappy with individual bits of the bill, but the overall consensus is that we want to do this, and we want to do it collectively. As I said right at the start, we are not going to do this on our own. I do not see there being any greater use of the section 8 powers, because I genuinely see a concerted effort from everybody who is involved.
On the occasions when NatureScot has to get involved, that can usually be done through deer management groups and consultation with the people who are involved. I very much hope that that will continue, because there is a collective effort to achieve our aims.
12:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
The bill gives certainty to the industry and the Government that we are working towards the same end and the same aims. Notwithstanding the point that I just made that there will be conflicts around different bits of the bill, overall, everybody is behind the aims and objectives, and everybody understands what we are trying to do. I therefore hope that we can resolve the vast majority of issues that come up through negotiation and consultation with the people who are on the ground, rather than by any kind of enforcement.