The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2173 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I am happy to have discussions with the member.
Amendment 64, by agreement, withdrawn.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Will the member take an intervention?
11:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I have nothing further to add.
Amendment 19 agreed to.
Amendments 20 to 26 moved—[Jim Fairlie]—and agreed to.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Amendments 32, 33 and 36 follow the committee’s recommendation at stage 1 to ensure that the provision relating to the requirement to see a dog with its mother is worded consistently with the Animal Welfare (Licensing of Activities Involving Animals) (Scotland) Regulations 2021. That covers circumstances in which a dog may be separated from its biological mother for welfare reasons or if the mother is deceased. The Scottish Government agrees with the committee and the Law Society of Scotland’s suggestion that responsibility for confirming that a dog is at least eight weeks old should be placed on both the acquirer and the supplier of the dog.
Since 2018, Scottish Government campaigns have consistently reinforced to prospective purchasers the importance of seeing a puppy with its mother, ideally at the breeder’s or seller’s premises, as well as verifying the age of the dog. Amendments 39 to 44 will place the relevant responsibility on the prospective supplier as well as on the prospective acquirer of the dog.
Finlay Carson’s amendment 69 would have the same effect as my amendments 39 to 44. I therefore ask him not to move it.
I move amendment 32.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
The reason why we put the certificate in is to get the proposition that the member wanted right at the start, which is that people must take due care and attention and get all the relevant details when they are going to buy or sell a dog. However, there is no legal penalty for not having the certificate. We think that requiring that the certificate be held for the rest of the dog’s life is not fair from the point of view that people would then believe that they are legally bound to have it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I will go back. The amendments will, however, avoid any misunderstanding or unnecessary anxiety for otherwise law-abiding and responsible owners who might misplace their certificate and be concerned that simply failing to retain a completed certificate to show to a police officer or an inspector would in itself be an offence that could lead to prosecution. I therefore cannot support amendment 4, which would require the certificate to be shown to a veterinary surgeon on request.
Even if my amendments were unsuccessful and section 4(5)(b) remained in the bill, it would remain the case that registered vets would not have similar enforcement powers to the police or inspectors. It is not clear whether vets, in practice, would want to become involved in investigations involving their clients and we could not mandate them to do so without thorough consultation. Their inclusion in the bill would need to be discussed and agreed with the veterinary professional bodies.
I move amendment 45.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I ask the member why she considers that the Government would try to put a loophole in the bill. We all agree that we want the bill to pass. The Government is not trying to do anything here that would stall it or stop it. We have given a clear commitment that, all things being equal, we will get this done within the 12-month period. The amendment is meant to give us an insurance policy in case anything goes wrong, so that we do not have to start again. There is nothing underhand or untoward being done here; it is simply to give us an insurance policy.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Will the member take an intervention on that particular point?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I am not saying that you should ask me to do that, but I am quite happy to hear your thoughts and considerations. You have scrutinised the matter as much as anybody has, so I am keen to hear your thoughts on it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I will let George Burgess answer that question in the interim.