The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2839 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
Correct.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
You are talking about two different things. Is there zero tolerance of violence? Absolutely—of course there is and, in particular, there is zero tolerance of violence against women and girls. I would not be vague about that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
I see where you are coming from. I think that you are trying to use the ability to remove the bus pass as a cure for antisocial behaviour across society—but it is not. The order is about protecting people who are travelling on the buses. When they are travelling on the buses, if people are carrying out antisocial behaviour, a sanction can be placed on them and that should be used as a deterrent. I hope that very few people, if any, will have their passes removed from them, because the threat of the deterrent should be enough to make them behave in a way that is appropriate.
A letter was received from the following representatives of bus companies: Sarah Boyd from Lothian Group; Duncan Cameron from First Bus Scotland; Colin Craig from West Coast Motors; Fiona Docherty from Stagecoach Ltd; Alistair Todd from Todd’s Travel; Simone Walsh from Scottish Citylink; Sandra Whitelaw from Whitelaws; and Tony Williamson from McGill’s. It said:
“There have been queries as to why a national approach to this is required, rather than it being dealt with locally through our own Conditions of Carriage. We believe that as the Concessions Schemes are National Entitlements (rather than determined at the local level) they should be accompanied by a national standard of conduct and potential sanction.”
The bus companies are asking the Parliament and the Government to do this for them, but that does not remove their ability to use their conditions of carriage.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
There are a number of different points in there, so you will have to forgive me if I forget some of them. You will have to come back and remind me of the issues that you have raised.
The removal of a pass will not solve all antisocial behaviour. You are absolutely right that there will be people over the age of 22 and under the age of 60 who commit antisocial behaviour, and those people will be dealt with through the conditions of carriage of the relevant bus company.
Should we have national conditions of carriage? You might be able to do that if you had a national bus company, but we do not. We have individual private companies that have their own conditions of carriage. The concessionary travel scheme is a national scheme that is delivered by the Government through Transport Scotland, so the bus companies are asking for a national approach and conditions of carriage for the scheme itself. That is what they have asked us for.
On how we change behaviour, we are dealing with a wide range of measures. Siobhian Brown has been carrying out work on antisocial behaviour. We will be engaging with education facilities to ensure that young people understand the conditions of the scheme, as well as with older and disabled people, so that they also understand the conditions of the scheme. They will be given that information when they are given their passes.
We have engaged very widely, including with the Scottish Youth Parliament. We did not engage directly with the Young Scot card administrators before we announced that the order was being laid, but there has been a lot of engagement with young people themselves. The Scottish Youth Parliament asked for direct correspondence and engagement with Carole Stewart and her colleague. Carole sat down with the Scottish Youth Parliament to discuss what it meant for those young people.
Some of the SYP members’ concerns were about how they felt on buses. We know that there is a wider societal issue of antisocial behaviour, and the removal of a bus pass will not solve all of that, but the SSI will allow us to have in place a deterrent, which has been asked for by the bus companies, by transport users and by the Parliament. That is what we are delivering.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
I was merely going to ask whether the member accepts that this is an opportunity to put a deterrent in place for antisocial behaviour. However, he has made his position clear, so that is probably a moot point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
Again, messaging goes beyond what the scheme is trying to do. The antisocial behaviour—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
Correct.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Jim Fairlie
That decision will be made by Transport Scotland as it goes through the process. As stated in the letter that I sent you, Transport Scotland will go through all the procedures that you have just outlined and will give the person the chance to put their case on the incident. Subsequently, it will be for Transport Scotland to decide whether there should be a temporary or permanent removal of the entitlement to free travel.