The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2161 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Public interest encompasses collective needs, values and interests of society as a whole rather than those of individuals or specific groups. The expression is to be understood and applied contextually. What constitutes public interest in different situations may be different. It may also evolve over time. For example, at the moment, a significant interest for the public at large is the concern about biodiversity loss and climate change. However, other public policy considerations might be relevant to any given decision, which requires NatureScot to take a very holistic approach to its decision making in relation to deer.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I do not understand. We have already said that it will be set out in the code of practice.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
The public interest will be proportionate to the area, as I said in my previous answer. It would be entirely different in west Perthshire from what it would be in lowland Scotland or urban Glasgow. It is not about the proportionality of the approach from Government or the legislation; it is about how NatureScot then defines that with the people who it is bringing those plans into place with. Does that make sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
When you say the deer groups, are you talking about the deer management groups?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Do you mean that the deer management groups think that their concerns about how they make a living would be overlooked in favour of a restoration order? I apologise if I am being dim here. I am just not quite getting your point.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
That makes sense to me now, so thank you for the clarification.
That is the whole point of the public interest test—when we talk about the public, we include those deer managers. They are part of the community in which they are living. Therefore, cognisance would have to be taken of all of that during any public interest test. Whether it is low or high ground, all those considerations will have to come into play.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I do not think that there will be any conflict of interest. The rationale for having a NatureScot person on a panel is that, if NatureScot has a level of expertise in a particular area, it can then be part of that panel. I am not sure why there is a concern around that, and I am happy to hear the committee’s views on that. The panels are there to do what the panels are there to do, and if NatureScot can add to a panel’s ability to do its job, I am not sure why there would be a fear of a conflict of interest.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
NatureScot is a public body. It therefore has a duty, and it must act reasonably and with impartiality when carrying out all its duties. Furthermore, deer panels have to be approved by the Scottish ministers. If the panels must be approved by a Scottish minister, if NatureScot has to comply with the duties upon it, and on the basis that everything that we are trying to do under the proposed legislation is to make things better—as everybody agrees we want to do—I am not convinced that there is a concern. I was going to say “legitimate concern”, but it will be legitimate to people at the time. I hope that we are giving some comfort on the basis that the proposal is not meant to create an issue; it allows us to get the best advice possible on deer control at every opportunity.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
It is purely to give flexibility, rather than saying, “Right—we can review that in 10 years’ time, so even if something happens two years from now, we cannae really review it until then.”
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
There has been only one section 8 scheme, which was signed off very recently. There may be some increase in the number of interventions, but I do not envisage them growing to the extent of requiring the use of section 8 powers.
One of the beauties of the current system is the staged process. There has to be consultation, conversation and persuasion, which is far more important than getting to a point at which we look at forcing somebody to do anything. NatureScot does that anyway. I will try to find the exact numbers that we have—