The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I would not say that the system has not worked at the moment—it is just that deer numbers are where they are, and we are now going to take action to try to get those numbers down.
There is a huge amount of good will in the sector. I have had a number of meetings with land managers and deer managers, and everybody is agreed that we want to do this and get the numbers down. There are varying reasons as to why the numbers may have gone up, but there is a concerted effort to get them down. Everybody is actually on board with that—that is one of the things that I have taken from my engagement with stakeholders on the bill. They may be unhappy with individual bits of the bill, but the overall consensus is that we want to do this, and we want to do it collectively. As I said right at the start, we are not going to do this on our own. I do not see there being any greater use of the section 8 powers, because I genuinely see a concerted effort from everybody who is involved.
On the occasions when NatureScot has to get involved, that can usually be done through deer management groups and consultation with the people who are involved. I very much hope that that will continue, because there is a collective effort to achieve our aims.
12:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
The bill gives certainty to the industry and the Government that we are working towards the same end and the same aims. Notwithstanding the point that I just made that there will be conflicts around different bits of the bill, overall, everybody is behind the aims and objectives, and everybody understands what we are trying to do. I therefore hope that we can resolve the vast majority of issues that come up through negotiation and consultation with the people who are on the ground, rather than by any kind of enforcement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
We might have to look into some technical issues with that, but I hear your point.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Again, no, I do not think that that would be appropriate at this stage. The code of practice will be worked out with stakeholders and the people it will be relevant to, and then we will bring it forward. We will not have the time to do it before we get to stage 3, but, as I have stated from the outset, it will absolutely be done in consultation with stakeholders, so that we get it right.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
If you put those things in primary legislation, they become primary legislation. We want them to be in the code of practice so that we have flexibility, because things might change, as we said earlier.
Putting the conditions into the bill will mean that they are put into primary legislation. I am dealing in the same way with another bill right now. If you set something out in legislation and then people want to change stuff later on because circumstances have changed, that is a whole different problem to deal with. Setting the conditions out in the code of practice gives us the flexibility to get it right.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
We are seeing them already, and they are happening all over the country. Those relationships are good and workable, and we hope that that approach will continue.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
NatureScot would certainly have to abide by the law. If we are talking about the code of practice, that code is there to get people to work collectively and collaboratively.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
That is a good point. We can take a further look at that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
It is important to remember that NatureScot will not just turn up at the door one day and give a five-day notice; there will have been plenty of engagement beforehand. The current notice period sits at 14 calendar days, and the proposal in the bill is five working days. The period has been shortened, because there is a general understanding that although there is a process to go through, if something needs to be done, and quickly, a five-day period will be adequate, particularly as NatureScot will have tried to engage with whoever it is has the problem on their land.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
NatureScot can do that anyway. It can de-escalate a control order if it believes that things are being done in the appropriate manner.