The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4207 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I want to ask a little bit about your views on the Prison Service’s alcohol and drugs strategy, which I do not think that we have covered yet—I might have missed it. Before I do so, though, I note that, in one of her previous responses, Lesley Graham raised the question of what more can be done and, perhaps, who should be involved. I do not want to go off on a completely different tangent, but I am interested in whether the industry has a role here, given the context within which you have been discussing alcohol harm issues.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
It would be interesting to have a little more detail about that and to see the breakdown. That would be welcome—thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is an interesting point.
We are coming up to time. Before I invite the witnesses to make any final comments on anything that we have not covered, Sharon Dowey has a question.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I bring this evidence-taking session to a close. I thank the witnesses for attending. We have picked up a lot of very helpful details.
Next week, we will continue to take evidence as part of the inquiry and we will focus on prevention and enforcement.
12:31 Meeting continued in private until 13:00.Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the 21st meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. I very much hope that everybody has had a good summer. We have received no apologies.
Our first item of business is a decision on whether to take in private item 3, which is a review of the evidence that we will hear today. Do we agree to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that. I will bring in Haydn Pasi on the original question about the context of supply and demand. What are the drivers from your perspective?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
On the physical space issue, would it be fair to say that there is a real desire across services to support work in prisons but that there is a practicality issue?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Marianna Marquardt, do you want to come in? We are slightly short of time, but from your organisation’s perspective, do you want to make any comments on the issue of release and the challenges that people face?
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Great. Thank you for that. There is lots for us to think about. Lesley, over to you.
Criminal Justice Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I suppose that that speaks to some of the issues that came up in the earlier session around knowledge not only of a person’s rights but of advocacy—that is, the importance of an individual for whom there are potential risks associated with non-compliance with an order or programme understanding those risks. That is where advocacy comes in. Should we be looking at that, in relation to not only drug harm but alcohol harm?