Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 7 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 4360 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you. In that case, I will bring in Ash Regan and then Fulton MacGregor.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you. I will have to come in there and ask Fulton MacGregor to ask his questions.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

I will maybe ask you to just ask your question, if you can, please.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Can I ask whether any of the other witnesses want to come in on that, in the interests of time?

11:00  

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you very much indeed. I am sorry that we had to slightly rush after the earlier technical hitch. That concludes our first evidence session. Thank you very much for coming today. I know that this has been a stressful time, but we greatly appreciate your contributions. I will now suspend the meeting for five minutes for a comfort break and a changeover of panel members.

11:03 Meeting suspended.  

11:10 On resuming—  

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Welcome back, everybody. We move on to our second panel of witnesses. As with the previous panel, I will allow up to 90 minutes for questions.

I welcome to the meeting Lynsey Walton, chief executive at National Ugly Mugs, and Laura Baillie, political officer with Scotland for Decrim. We are joined online by Niki Adams, from the English Collective of Prostitutes. I welcome them all warmly. I also thank those of them who were able to send in written submissions in advance of the evidence session.

I remind everyone that we are here to consider the provisions of the bill, so I am keen for questions to focus on those.

If at any point anybody needs a break, they should just indicate to me or the clerk on my left-hand side.

I begin with broadly the same opening question as I asked the first panel of witnesses. What parts of the bill are the witnesses opposed to and why? Is there anything in the bill that they support or that could be improved?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

I think that Niki Adams wants to come in before Pauline McNeill asks her final question.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Yes—in you come, Niki.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

I call Sharon Dowey, to be followed by Fulton MacGregor.

Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]

Secure Accommodation

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Some people have suggested that, now that a larger group of older young people with more serious offending will be able to be detained in secure care, we will need to differentiate the approach in secure care on age grounds and we will need to separate those who are there on welfare grounds from those who are there on justice grounds. I am concerned by that. Does the minister agree that doing that would be unhelpful and that the founding principle of our care for children—that it is based on needs as well as deeds—still holds true?