The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 613 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
No, this is the entire range of what is in the agreement.
I expect there to be progress on everything, because if there were not a willingness to make progress on those points, they would not have been part of the agreement. Nobody has said subsequently, either from the EU side or from the UK side, that that is not important or that there is not an interest in making those things happen. It is a package, but, of course, there are different interests from the European Union side and its member states, and from the UK side.
I would expect there to be progress on all of those things, but you have challenged me to say when I think that the committee will be able to scrutinise the details of a proposed SPS agreement. I am not in a position to answer that, but I give the committee the commitment that, the next time I meet with the UK Government, I will raise the questions of when the committee can expect to see documentation and text on that.
10:30I make the point again that we saw no documentation and no text as part of the process in the run-up to the agreement, and I will be making the point with the UK Government that that is not the way to deal with the Scottish Government or with Welsh or Northern Irish colleagues as part of the agreement process. Our committees and our Parliaments need to see the detail as soon as possible.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
I hope not—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
Oh, I very much think that, unless the United Kingdom had agreed the terms of the headline agreement, the dynamic alignment would not have passed go.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
I am sorry—there were no formal discussions between the Scottish Government and any European Union member state or any individual institution. Officials from representative offices and embassies talk to one another about progress that is being made and about what is understood to be happening. That is the way in which civil servants talk to one another. It is not common practice for there to be formal records of discussions in passing between officials. Mr Bibby knows that that is not the way in which such things operate.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
I have made my view clear to the UK Government that, unless the process changes, I am at the end of the road. We cannot have the United Kingdom reaching significant agreements on very important devolved responsibilities, with the system not working properly because the United Kingdom Government chooses for it not to work properly. We are at the end of the road. If the situation does not improve, there will not have been a reset, because what is happening now is the same as what happened under the previous UK Government.
It is a fact that meetings have been cancelled. It is a fact that documents and details have not been shared. It is a fact that we can learn more from the front page of the Financial Times or by speaking with diplomats from other countries. That is not how we should be doing things. That should matter to everybody on the committee—those from all parties. There is zero defence for what is happening.
It is not a case of two partners not wishing to have the best of relations. We in Scotland, along with our colleagues in Wales and Northern Ireland, are trying to make this work, but the process for the UK-EU summit agreement did not work. Very soon, we will be able to see, based on how the UK Government acts in relation to its negotiating mandate and its relations with the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish Governments, the detail that the committee has asked me about. Proper inclusion involves consultation, not just read-outs of what the UK Government is negotiating on our behalf. Very soon, we will see whether there has been improvement. I am as interested as the committee is in UK ministers answering those questions in public and in detail.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
I am sure that it did come up. I did not attend the meeting that Mr Kerr—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
I think that it is really important that—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
No. There were no formal discussions between the Scottish Government and European Union member states—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
I will revert to the committee.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Angus Robertson
I agree with Mr Harvie that structural changes are needed in a devolved context, although I do not believe that devolved governance is the optimal solution for Scotland’s governance. I agree that, unless there is a requirement on the UK Government to have better intergovernmental relations, that will too often, sadly, just not be a priority. That is not good enough.